Chiral edge state as topological properity of bulk state As far as I know, quantum hall effect and quantum spin hall effect has chiral edge state. Chiral edge state is usually closely related with delocalization, since back scattering is forbidden. However, some topological nontrivial state does not have chiral state, such as majorana bound state in topological superconductor.
I am quite interested whether the existance of chiral edge state is determined by bulk topological properity?
Thanks in advance
 A: The Majorana bound state inside a vortex of a topological superconductor is, indeed, not a chiral edge state. It does not follow that the topological superconductor does not have a chiral edge state. It does! Solve, for example, the BdG equations for a p+ip superconductor with open boundary conditions, and you'll see it.
The existence of edge modes is typically argued to be tied to the fact that if you have a state with a nontrivial topological invariant, you need to close the excitation gap to change it. So, if you have an interface between a topological state and vacuum (which is topologically trivial) there are gapless edge modes to accommodate the change in topological invariant that necessarily occurs across the interface.
A: The short answer is, yes, the chiral edge state is determined by bulk topological property. It is known as bulk-edge correspondence.
The paper you should read is: Protected edge modes without symmetry - 1301.7355.
Generically, to determine whether the edge states are robust is by determining whether the edge states are ``protected'' by any of the three mechanism:
1. Symmetry (-protected)
2. Chirality (-protected)
3. Statistics (-protected), i.e. nontrivial (fractional) Statistics protected.
This is explained in the Popular Summary of this paper.
You may also have strong interests to learn when the non-chiral edge states can be gapped, which you can find a concise discussion in this paper: Boundary Degeneracy of Topological Order-1212.4863, they apply the so-called "boundary fully gapping rules" (or equivalent to a "Lagrangian subgroup" discussed in some other papers) to find the conditions of gapped edge, and further count the (topological) ground state degeneracy of a system with gapped boundaries.
