2
$\begingroup$

Consider a free particle with rest mass $m$ moving along a geodesic in some curved spacetime with metric $g_{\mu\nu}$:

$$S=-m\int d\tau=-m\int\Big(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\Big)d\lambda=\int L\ d\lambda\tag{1}$$

$$L=-m\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}=-m\Big(-g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}\Big)^{1/2}\tag{2}$$

The canonical 4-momentum $P_\alpha$ can be derived from the Lagrangian $L$ using the following calculation: \begin{eqnarray*} P_\alpha &=& \frac{\partial L}{\partial(dx^\alpha/d\lambda)}\tag{3} \\ &=& \frac{m}{2}\frac{d\lambda}{d\tau}\Big(g_{\alpha\nu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}+g_{\mu\alpha}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\Big)\tag{4} \\ &=& m\ g_{\alpha\nu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau}\tag{5} \\ &=& m\ \frac{dx_\alpha}{d\tau} \tag{6} \end{eqnarray*} where we have used the fact that the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ is symmetric.

Thus, expressed in contravariant form, we have derived an expression for the 4-momentum $P^\alpha$ given by
$$P^\alpha=m\ \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}\tag{7}$$ using a completely general metric $g_{\mu\nu}$.

Is it correct to interpret the components of $P^\alpha$ in the following manner:

$P^0$ is the energy of the particle,

$P^i$ is the 3-momentum of the particle in the $\partial_i$ direction?

In other words is $P^\alpha$ the energy-momentum vector with respect to a local orthonormal basis?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's correct except that the second-last equality (v3) only holds for constant metric. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jan 19 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ I've added equation numbers. Could you tell me which equation you are referring to? $\endgroup$ – John Eastmond Jan 20 at 10:09
  • $\begingroup$ $\uparrow$ Eq. (6). I would just delete it. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jan 20 at 10:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $x_{\alpha}:=g_{\alpha\nu}x^{\nu}$ by definition, so the $\tau$-differentiation would also differentiate the metric. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jan 20 at 10:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that $x^\alpha$ is not a vector field (the notation is abused in this case). Hence lowering its index does not actually make any sense. $\endgroup$ – mmeent Jan 20 at 10:49
0
$\begingroup$

The covariant component $-P_0$ is the conserved total energy (kinetic, potential and rest energy) in stationary spacetimes and if $x^0=t$. The transformation from the spatial components of the 4-momentum into the local 3-momentum is best done over the local linear velocity $v$ (we use the +--- signature and natural units):

$$P_{\alpha}= \left( \sum_{\beta=1}^{4} \ g_{\alpha \beta} \ \dot{x}^{\beta} \right) - q \ A_{\alpha} = \frac{v_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{1-||v||^2}} \sqrt{-g_{\alpha \alpha}} - (1-||v||^2) \ q \ A_{\alpha}$$

The contravariant momentum is simply $P^{\alpha}=\dot{x}^{\alpha}$. If you regard only geodesics for uncharged particles the electromagnetic vector potential $A$ and the particle charge $q$ can be set to $0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.