In have a question about the following exercise. I am given the following expressions for the scalar and vector potential, $$\vec{A}(\vec{r},t) = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}\left[\frac{x}{c}\hat{x} + tU(z)\hat{z}\right],$$ $$V(\vec{r},t) = 0$$

Here $U(z)$ is the unit step function. The question is to derive a gauge transformation $\lambda$ such that the Coulomb Gauge is satisfied ($\nabla\cdot\vec{A} = 0$). I denote the new potential as $\vec{A'}$ and write, $$\vec{A'} = \vec{A} + \nabla \lambda$$, $$\nabla \cdot\vec{A'} = \nabla \cdot \vec{A} + \nabla^2 \lambda.$$ So then, $$\nabla^2\lambda = -\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0c} - \frac{\sigma t}{\epsilon_0} \delta(z).$$ So to find a suitable gauge I need to integrate this equation. The second term however gives me some trouble. I would assume that integrating a delta function twice gives you a ramp function, so I would find for $\lambda$, $$\lambda = -\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0c} z^2 - \frac{\sigma t}{\epsilon_0} z U(z). $$ $zU(z)$ is then the analytical representation of the ramp function. The answer sheet however states the following, $$\lambda = -\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0c} z^2 - \frac{2\sigma t}{\epsilon_0} |z|. $$ This looks very different from my answer, especially for $z<0$ where my second term vanishes while theirs grows linearly. If anyone can point out to me where I am going wrong it would be very much appreciated!


First of all, I assume that in the second term in the "right" answer 2 should be in denominator; if this is the case, it actually satisfies the equation necessary (as $\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2} |z| = 2 \delta(z)$ in terms of distributions)

Both your answer and the other one are actually OK; different gauge transformations can lead to Couloumb gauge. This is because the solution to $∇^2λ=−σϵ_0c−σtϵ_0δ(z).$ is not unique; any function satisfying the homogeneous equation ($\nabla^2 \lambda = 0$) can be added to a given solution, and the result would be a solution as well. Difference between your answer and the "right" one is a function linear in $z$ (provided that 2 is in the denominator, as I mentioned earlier), thus, it satisfies the homogeneous equation.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.