2
$\begingroup$

I have long been unable to follow section 12.3 of Georgi - Lie algebras in particle physics. This section deals with how irreps of $SU(3)$ decompose as irreps of subgroups $H \subset SU(3)$ and is later generalised to $SU(N)$ in section 13.5. Although I understand the concept and have seen other treatments that I follow, I would like some help understanding Georgi's treatment.

First Georgi says (as far as I can see without justification) that the fundamental, $\mathbf{3}$, of $SU(3)$ decomposes as an $SU(2)\times U(1)$ doublet with hypercharge $1/3$ and a singlet of hypercharge $-2/3$. Is it clear why? How does this generalise for the $\mathbf{N}$ decomposing in arbitrary subgroups $H \subset SU(N)$?

Following this Georgi considers an arbitrary Young Tableau (i.e. irrep) of $SU(3)$ with $n$ boxes; I believe with arbitrary symmetry of the indices. He assumes that $j$ indices of the tensor transform as $SU(2)$ doublets and (n-j) as singlets -- but why is this the only possibility? Is it because any irrep of $SU(2)$ can be formed from tensor products of the doublet?

We go on to represent the $n-j$ singlets by a Young Tableau of $n-j$ boxes in a row: does Georgi mean $SU(3)$ Tableaux or $SU(2)$ Tableaux? From figure 12.6 it seems the are $SU(3)$ Tableaux but then why must they be rows?

For the actual algorithm Georgi says, without proof,

To determine whether a given $SU(2)$ rep, $\alpha$, appears in the decomposition we take the tensor product of $\alpha$ with the $n-j$ boxes.

I need some help with this. Firstly does this mean writing the $SU(2)$ rep as a Young Tableau and taking the $SU(3)$ tensor product with $n-j$ boxes in a row? And what value of $j$ do we choose?

Now in the examples (12.6 onwards) I don't understand the notation. In (12.6) we are looking for how the $6$ (two boxes in a row) decomposes. What is the notation below? Is it $\left( SU(2) \textrm{ irrep } \, \, \, SU(3) \textrm{ irrep } \right)$ where the $SU(3)$ irrep is row of some number $n-j$ of boxes for different $j$? In that case how was $n$ chosen?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

OP asks many questions, so we will be somewhat sketchy.

  1. Actually the Lie group $$G~:=~SU(2) \times U(1)$$ is not a subgroup of $SU(3)$ but $G/\mathbb{Z}_2$ is. This is because the group homomorphism $$G~\ni~ (g,\alpha)~~\stackrel{\Phi}{\mapsto}~~ \begin{pmatrix} \alpha g & \mathbb{0}_{2\times 1} \cr \mathbb{0}_{1\times 2} & \alpha^{-2}\end{pmatrix}_{3\times 3}~\in~SU(3)$$ has kernel $${\rm Ker}(\Phi)~=~\{\pm (\mathbb{1}_{2\times 2},1)\}~\cong~\mathbb{Z}_2.$$

  2. Here we will argue at the level of Lie algebras $$su(2) \oplus u(1)\subseteq su(3).$$ In detail, we identify $$su(3)~\cong~ {\rm span}_{\mathbb{R}}(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3,\lambda_4,\lambda_5,\lambda_6,\lambda_7,\lambda_8)$$ with Hermitian traceless $3\times 3$ matrices; the isospin $$su(2)~\cong~ {\rm span}_{\mathbb{R}}(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3)$$ with Hermitian traceless $2\times 2$ block matrices in rows/columns 1,2; while the hypercharge $$u(1)~\cong~ {\rm span}_{\mathbb{R}}(\lambda_8)$$ is generated by the diagonal traceless matrix ${\rm diag}(1,1,-2)$ times an real number. (Here $\lambda_a$ denotes Gell-mann matrices). In other words, up to normalization of the hyperchange, the fundamental representation decomposes as $${\bf 3}~\to~{\bf 2}_{1/3}\oplus {\bf 1}_{-2/3}.$$

  3. Concerning OP's questions on arbitrary $su(3)$ representations, for intuition purposes, the tensor picture is perhaps helpful: Each tensor index (corresponding to a box) takes values $1,2,3$. The index values $1,2$ correspond to an $su(2)$ dublet, while the index value $3$ corresponds to an $su(2)$ singlet. This leads to a distributive property, where a box (i.e. a $su(3)$ triplet) can turn into an $su(2)$ dublet or an $su(2)$ singlet. This is what Georgi tries to indicate in eqs. (12.16-19). As OP already anticipates, the $j$th $su(2)$ irrep can be realized as a symmetric tensor product $({\bf 2j+1})\cong {\bf 2}^{\odot 2j}$ of the $su(2)$ dublet ${\bf 2}$ alone.

  4. Concerning the generalization to $SU(n) \times SU(m) \times U(1)$ in Georgi's section 13.5, see e.g. my Phys.SE answer here.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ given the OP asks about the more general case, it would be nice to expand a bit on the cosetting by $\mathbb{Z}_2$ given the literature (see for instance Hagen, C. R., and A. J. Macfarlane. "Reduction of representations of SUm+ n with respect to the subgroup SUm⊗ SUn." Journal of Mathematical Physics 6.9 (1965): 1366-1371. ) tends to omit this subtle point. $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Jan 7 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ I updated the answer. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jan 8 at 16:00
  • $\begingroup$ Very helpful - what about the quoted part from georgi... The algorithm is given without proof so even though now I understand it I'd like to know how the combinatorics works out correctly $\endgroup$ – lux Jan 11 at 23:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.