1
$\begingroup$

The following image is from Concepts of Physics by Dr. H.C.Verma, from the chapter "Speed of Light", page 447, topic "Michelson Method":

enter image description here

For higher image resolution click here.

The following text is from the "Science Hero" article - Michelson’s Method for Determining Velocity of Light, under the topic "Disadvantages of Michelson’s method":

At high speeds [angular speed of the rotating mirror], the rotating mirror may break. But speed can be reduced by increasing the number of faces of the mirror.

I can understand that when the number of faces in the rotating mirror is increased, the clear image of the source could be seen at lower angular speeds since the angle by which the mirror needs to rotate for the next face to take the position of the adjacent face is decreased.

The speed of light as measured by this method is given by

$$c=\frac{D\omega N}{2\pi}$$

where $D$ is the distance travelled by the light between reflections from the polygonal mirror, $\omega$ is the minimum possible angular speed of rotation of the mirror when the image becomes steady and $N$ is the number of faces in the polygonal mirror.

As $c$ is a constant, the product $\omega N$ is also constant. So, it can be seen that when we increase the number of faces the rotating mirror, the clear image could be obtained at lesser angular speeds. Now as $N$ gradually approaches infinity, i.e., the polygonal mirror becomes a cylindrical mirror, the angular speed $\omega$ tends to zero. So I think there must be a highest possible value for $N$ which gives the most benefit. What is its value, and what is the reason for this choice? Are there any other advantages of using a larger number of faces in the rotating mirror besides the one discussed in the question?


Related question asked by me: Number of reflecting surfaces in the rotating mirror in the Michelson method of determination of speed of light

I think Michelson method of determining the speed of light is different from the Michelson Morley experiment. So, I had to use the query michelson speed of light -morley as my initial results were populated with the second experiment which has a similar name.

This method of determination of speed of light is briefly discussed here and here.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The purpose of having a relatively large number N of mirrors on the polygon is to increase the switching rate for a given rotational speed. This allows the distance to the retroreflecting mirror to be short enough to be practical. An important factor is that the beam size needs to be large enough to ensure that a significant fraction of the beam will reach the distant retroreflector. As you probably know, a light beam spreads faster when its waist diameter is small. This means the mirrors need to be relatively large, depending on how far away the retroreflector is. In turn, this means that N must be relatively small for a fixed-size wheel.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. Could you please tell whether my assertion on the product $\omega N$ as a constant ("As $c$ is a constant, […] $\omega$ tends to zero."), correct or not? $\endgroup$
    – Vishnu
    Jan 3 '20 at 16:44
  • $\begingroup$ Your assertion is "kind of" true. But it seems to ignore the distance from the polygonal mirror to the retroreflector. The time between adjacent mirror facets being in position to reflect the beam should always be equal to the round trip time from the polygon to the retroreflector and back. $\endgroup$
    – S. McGrew
    Jan 3 '20 at 17:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.