1
$\begingroup$

Starting from a Fermionic second quantized Hamiltonian as $$ H = \sum_{A,B} \psi^{\dagger}_A \mathcal{H}_{A,B} \psi_B $$ Imposing time-reversal symmetry and charge-conjugation inversion symmetry, like this i.e,

$$ \tau H \tau^{-1} = {H}\\c H c^{-1} = H $$ $H$ reduces to $$ U_T^{\dagger} \mathcal{H}^* U_T = + \mathcal{H} \\ U_c^{\dagger} \mathcal{H}^* U_c = - \mathcal{H} $$ Here $\mathcal{H}$ is the single particle Hamiltonian obtained from the second quantized hamiltonian. Now, I don't see how these two equations impose a reality condition on $\mathcal H$.

I can understand that in the former equation $\mathcal H^*$ is the same as $ \mathcal H$ up-to a rotation by a unitary matrix, and this is convincible to be real because of the +ve sign on the RHS.

But in the latter equation, the sign is flipped which leads me to believe that the Hamiltonian is imaginary.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

To see how this can happen mathematically, consider the matrix $$ A=\left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right] $$ which is Hermitian and real (so in the standard basis). Changing basis means conjugating by a unitary, such as $Q$ where $$ Q=\left[\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{-i}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} \end{array}\right] $$ and in the new basis, $A$ is represented by $$ Q^\dagger AQ=\left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 & i\\ -i & 0 \end{array}\right] $$ which is imaginary. Same operator, two mathematical pictures, one real, the other imaginary. Now in physics the basis that leads to one of these conditions can be strange, but mathematically there is no issue.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.