Is the expectation value of a Fermi field operator a Grassmann number? It's often noted that Bosonic fields result from quantizing classical field theories defined on a regular numbers, whereas Fermionic fields arise when quantizing a classical field theory defined on Grassmann numbers.
It is no surprise, then, that the expectation values of operators associated with Bosonic fields are normal (non-Grassmann) numbers. For concreteness, we can consider a real scalar field $\phi(x)$ with some associated raising and lowering operators $b^\dagger_q$ and $b_q$. A coherent state of the field $|\alpha> = Ae^{\alpha b^\dagger_q}|0\rangle$ has expectation value $\langle\alpha| b^\dagger_q |\alpha\rangle = \alpha$, clearly a run-of-the-mill number.
Since the expectation value of a lowering operator for a Bosonic field is a regular (non-Grassmann) number, should the expectation value of a Fermionic field operator $\psi(x)$ or a corresponding lowering operator $a_q$ be a Grassmann number? Although I can't understand why this wouldn't be the case (shouldn't the "typical value" of a Grassmann number drawn from some probability distribution be a Grassmann number?), it seems easy to construct a counterexample. The state
$$|\text{confusing}\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1 + a^\dagger_q)|0\rangle$$
Leads to $\langle \text{confusing}|a_q|\text{confusing}\rangle = \frac{1}{2}$. Yet it's not clear to me why such an expectation value should generally be a regular number. As a result, I'm curious if there are any clear ways of understanding the origin of this behavior.
Is the expectation value of a Fermi field operator a Grassmann number? Why or why not?
 A: Theoretically speaking, the expectation value of a Fermi field operator must be a Grassmann number. How do we observe a Grassmann number-value in experiments? Beats me!
(Added note: Since here we are concerned with field quantization and Fock space rather than Hilbert space, one can NOT escape from Grassmann number given the anti-symmetric requirement for the multi-particle state. )
Fortunately, in reality there is no such case as fermion field acquiring a non-zero vacuum expectation value (VEV). Otherwise it would break some crucial symmetries (Lorentz, particle number, etc.) and surely would open a Pandora's box.  
That being said, a pair of Fermi fields CAN acquire a non-zero VEV, such as the cooper pair condensation $<\psi_\uparrow\psi_\downarrow>$ in the celebrated BCS theory of superconductivity. In this case, the VEV is an ordinary number, since the multiplication of two Grassmann-odd number is Grassmann-even. 
But hold on! is the multiplication of two Grassmann-odd number indeed a real number? Actually it's a ring instead of a real number (with weird properties like $c^2 = (ab)^2 = 0$, for $a$ and $b$ being Grassmann-odd numbers). 
In other words, our cherished canonical/path integral QFT is performing the sleight of hand of  transforming rings into real number VEVs. It's a can of worms mathematicians would surely cringe from. But we physicists are the dauntless and shameless bunch, are we?
