My book says that for current flowing in a wire

$Ri^2dt = mcdT + hS(T-T_0)dt $

and when equilibrium is reached

$Ri^2dt = hS(T-T_0)dt $

where R is the resistance of the conductor, i is the current, dt is a time differential, m is the mass of the conductor, c is the specific heat, dT is the differential of temperature, h is the thermal conductivity, S the section of the wire, and external environment temperature. The books says the electrical work done by the generator provoques an increase in temperature of the wire and heat is given to the external environment

I am trying to make sense of this equation by using the first law of thermodynamics,$W=Q-\Delta U $ but signs are not coming out well and I am not sure of how should I do the energy balance or if I should make the external environment part of my system or not.

My try:

If the system is composed of just the wire The work done by the generator should be - because it enters the system, so $W=- Ri^2dt $ I am not sure if the increase of temperature of the wire should be $\Delta U$ or $Q$, because internal energy is due to temperature but this is also heat being given to the environment, right? Considering it corrisponds to $\Delta U$ we have $\Delta U =mcdT $

and so the heat should be given by Newton's conduction law, and since it leaves the system it is negative, so, $Q= - hS(T-T_0)dt $, then

$W=Q-\Delta U $ yields

$-Ri^2dt=- hS(T-T_0)dt-mcdT $ which would give the right answer, but Why can't I consider $Ri^2dt$ to be instead the heat produced by the circuit and released to the environment, how would the energy balance be in that case?

One more thing, why does $ mcdT $ has temperature expressed with a differential, while $ hS(T-T_0)dt $ does not?

  • $\begingroup$ Let us know when you are done editing before we offer any answers!!! $\endgroup$
    – Bob D
    Nov 22 '19 at 22:23
  • $\begingroup$ sorry, I am done $\endgroup$
    – J.C.VegaO
    Nov 22 '19 at 22:24

This starts out with the time derivative of the first law equation: $$\frac{dU}{dt}=\frac{dQ}{dt}-\frac{dW}{dt}$$where $$\frac{dU}{dt}=mC\frac{dT}{dt}\tag{1}$$$$\frac{dQ}{dt}=hS(T_0-T)\tag{2}$$and$$\frac{dW}{dt}=-i^2R\tag{3}$$

With regard to Eqn.2, this does not represent conductive heat transfer. It represents the rate of convective heat transfer from the surroundings to the wire. In this equation, S represents the surface area of the wire and h represents the convective heat transfer coefficient. It says that the rate of heat flow from the surroundings to the wire is proportional to the temperature difference between the surroundings and the wire.

With regard to Eqn.3, $i^2R$ represents the power supplied to the wire by the surroundings (via a potential difference imposed across the wire by an electrical source in the surroundings). This is the rate at which the surroundings do work on the wire (which comprises the system).

If we combine the previous equations, we obtain: $$mC\frac{dT}{dt}=hS(T_0-T)+i^2R$$Multiplying this equation by dt gives back your original equation.

  • $\begingroup$ so , the reason why is hS(T0−T) and not hSdT is because it is convective heat transfer instead of conductive heat transfer? $\endgroup$
    – J.C.VegaO
    Nov 23 '19 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ If it were conduction, it would be $kS\frac{\Delta T}{\Delta x}$, where $\Delta x$ is the distance over which the temperature changes. The convective heat transfer rate can be alternately interpreted as conduction of sorts if we set the heat transfer coefficient equal to $h=k/\delta$, where k is the thermal conductivity of the gas surrounding the wire and $\delta$ is the thickness of the thermal boundary layer. We would then have $\dot{Q}=kS\frac{T_0-T}{\delta}$ $\endgroup$ Nov 24 '19 at 1:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.