When the isotope Nitrogen-14 (which has a nuclear spin of 1) undergoes beta decay, it releases an electron, which has a spin of -1/2. Since the mass of the Nitrogen-14 isotope stays the same (albeit, it changes by a negligibly small amount), the angular momentum would stay the same. This violates the conservation of angular momentum as the sum of the angular momenta, is 1/2 (which is smaller than one). Therefore the anti-nuetrino released must have a spin of 1/2? Is this explanation correct, and if not, why? Are their any other explanations of the 1/2 spin of antinuetrinos? And if there is, what are they?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Are you asking why an antineutrino should have the same spin as a neutrino? Or are you asking how we know experimentally that they have spin 1/2? How we found out historically? How we could demonstrate it today from this particular example? Why this example? $\endgroup$ – user4552 Nov 22 '19 at 4:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ When someone asks for a clarification in a comment, the thing to do is to edit the question, not provide the clarification in the comment thread. $\endgroup$ – user4552 Nov 22 '19 at 4:39
  • $\begingroup$ You have to be careful about saying a particle has “spin -1/2”. There are two kinds of spin quantum numbers. We usually say particles have only spin 0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2, ... . This quantum number $s$ determines the magnitude of the intrinsic angular momentum as $\sqrt{s(s+1)}\hbar$. Another quantum number, $m_s$ determines just one component of angular momentum (say, the $z$-component) as $m_s\hbar$. It can be negative. $\endgroup$ – G. Smith Nov 22 '19 at 5:37
  • $\begingroup$ $^14N$, $^15N$ are stable isotopes. $^13N$ is a positron emitter. Your example is confusing. $\endgroup$ – my2cts Nov 22 '19 at 7:43

Spins are angular momenta. Angular momentum is a vector, and conservation of angular momentum imposes the sign on the spin found. If in a reaction the electron goes off with a spin -1/2, the antineutrino-electron ( which conserves lepton number) has to have +1/2.

The title though

Why do antinutrinos have a spin of 1/2?

is not concerned with the vector sign, but with the assignment of spin 1/2 . That spin 1/2 was necessarily assigned, and fermions were discovered, is also due to angular momentum conservation. If this assignment were not given to electrons and protons and neutrons back when they were new discoveries, physics would have to give up on angular momentum conservation, which is still one of the main (axiomatic) laws in physics theories, classical and quantum mechanical.

Conservation of energy and momentum in decays forced the neutrinos existence , and conservation of angular momentum assigned their spin. At first, experiments assigned a zero mass to neutrinos, but the existence of neutrino oscillations shows that a small mass has to be assigned to them, although experimentally there are only limits.

Conservation of lepton number shows that antineutrinos have to be there. and this is included in the standard model, of particle physics . At present the standard model has not been falsified, and it is very good at predicting new phenomena.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.