0
$\begingroup$

I have a Hamiltonian of the form $H = \Sigma_{ij} H_{ij}a^\dagger_ia_j$, and I want to diagonlize it:

Let $ H_{ij} = \Sigma_{\alpha}U_{i\alpha}\epsilon_\alpha U^*_{j\alpha} $, where U is a unitary matrix. Then I proceed by inserting this in the first equation:

$ H = \Sigma_{ij\alpha}U_{i\alpha}\epsilon_\alpha U^*_{j\alpha}a^\dagger_ia_j = \Sigma_\alpha \epsilon_\alpha \Big(\Sigma_i U_{i\alpha}a^\dagger_i\Big)\Big(\Sigma_jU^\dagger_{j\alpha}a_j\Big) $

Defining $ b^\dagger_\alpha = \Sigma_i U_{i\alpha}a^\dagger_i $ my Hamiltonian can be writen as:

$ H = \Sigma_\alpha \epsilon_\alpha b^\dagger_\alpha b_\alpha $ which is diagonal. My first question is: why is this a diagonal hamiltonian? How can I be so sure?

The second question is: how to effectvely use this diagonalization procedure?

I have now a Hamiltonian of the form: $ H = \epsilon_\alpha a^\dagger a + \epsilon_b b^\dagger b - J(a^\dagger b + b^\dagger a) $ where a and b are two modes, that can be either bosonic or fermionic.

To diagonalize this I have to use the procedure described only in the part that is multiplied by -J?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

(1) I guess the best answer of this is “because it meets the definition of a diagonal Hamiltonian,” but I don’t actually have a handy definition of a diagonal Hamiltonian.

Basically what we mean is that we can write our Hilbert space as a product of $n$ smaller spaces such that our Hamiltonian has the form of $$\hat H = \hat h_1 \otimes I \otimes \dots \otimes I ~+~ I \otimes h_2 \otimes \dots \otimes I ~+~ \dots ~+~ I \otimes I \otimes \dots \otimes \hat h_n,$$ where $I$ is the identity operator.

In your case, to “be sure” you will want to confirm that your $b_i$ are commuting or anticommuting annihilators, so that they satisfy either $$ b_m b_n^\dagger \mp b_n^\dagger b_m = \delta_{mn}$$with the $-$ sign for the bosonic case and the $+$ sign for the fermionic case. If you have this, then you have a Fock space in the form of the occupation numbers for the states that the $b_n$ annihilate, and your Hamiltonian is diagonal with regard to that Fock space.

(2) Yes, you essentially want to imagine that you have a matrix looking something like $\begin{bmatrix}\epsilon_a & -J\\-J & \epsilon_b\end{bmatrix}.$

You diagonalize that and then you try to transfer that basic result to a result on the annihilators, to find the perspective from which the Hamiltonian is diagonal.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ very well, thank you; I guess I have to read a bit more on that Fock space and second quantization thing. This is new to me and I have some doubts yet. But what you said was helpful. I will try to diagonalize the hamiltonian using this, it seems to be the right way. Thank you $\endgroup$
    – Dimitri
    Nov 19 '19 at 2:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.