0
$\begingroup$

So, there's a question in my textbook that explains the following scenario:

A physicist runs two experiments A and B to prepare quantum systems in a variety of initial states. In experiment A he uses a probabilistic machine that can prepare a single quantum system in one of $n$ possible pure states $\{\lvert \psi_1 \rangle, \lvert \psi_2 \rangle, ..., \lvert \psi_n \rangle \}$ with corresponding probabilities $\{\lvert p_1 \rangle, \lvert p_2 \rangle, ..., \lvert p_n \rangle \}$. In experiment $B$, instead, he generates m non-interacting quantum systems, each of them prepared in its corresponding lower energy state $\{\lvert \phi_1 \rangle, \lvert \phi_2 \rangle, ..., \lvert \phi_m \rangle \}$. Let $\rho_A$ and $\rho_B$ be the density matrix operators for the quantum states prepared in experiments $A$ and $B$, respectively.

And asks the following:

  1. Write down an expression for both $\rho_A$ and $\rho_B$ and derive an expression for the expected value of $\hat{O_A}$ and $\hat{O_B}$ (the Hermitian operators describing an observable of the system A and kth system of system B, respectively).

  2. Let $P_j$ and $P_k$ be the projectors associated to the states $\lvert \psi_j \rangle$ and $\lvert \psi_k \rangle$ produced by $A$. Discuss whether the product $P_jP_k$ vanishes.

For question 1, I wrote the following for system $A$:

$$\rho_A = \lvert \psi_j\rangle\langle \psi_j\rvert \tag{1}$$

$$\hat{O_A} = Tr(\hat{O_A} \rho_A) = Tr(\hat{O_A}\lvert\psi_j\rangle\langle \psi_j\rvert) \tag{2}$$

My justification for equation 1 is that system A produces pure states only and that only "a single" state is generated, so therefore the density matrix only contains one term (here j represents the jth state generated). However, the question mentions their probabilities which I haven't included in my answer because only one state is generated. Should $p_j$ be the coefficient in equation (1) as opposed to just the number 1?

For system $B$, I have the following:

$$\rho_B = \frac{1}{m}\sum_i\lvert \phi_i\rangle\langle \phi_i\rvert \tag{3}$$

My justification for this is that experiment B describes a mixed state, which produces a total of m states and therefore each state has a probability of $\frac{1}{m} $. I am unsure, however, about how to write the expected value for experiment $B$.

For the second question, I can express the product as

$$ P_jP_k = \lvert \psi_j\rangle\langle \psi_j\rvert \psi_k\rangle\langle \psi_k\rvert \tag{4}$$

But as I'm given no information regarding the orthogonality of the states for experiment $A$, how am I supposed to deduce whether this equation vanishes or not?

If anyone could provide any hints or insight into my answers, it would be greatly appreciated. I am not fully confident that I correctly understand the differences between pure and mixed states.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Each pure State $|\psi_n\rangle$ of the quantum system is a multi-particle state describing all particles of the system. So your pure states are all possible states of the system. Since it is not prepared in a state $|\psi\rangle$ there are plenty of possibilites of states in which your systems could be.

Let us say you prepared your system in $|\psi\rangle$, then it is in a pure state. What physicists call a pure state is essentially the density matrix / statistical operator:

$$\hat{\rho} = |\psi\rangle \langle\psi|$$

Since you are given the probabilities of the state, which are just real numbers, you can assume your system to be in a mixed state. Also, probabilites are usually not denoted as kets. For a mixed state you write:

$$\hat{\rho} = \sum_i p_i|\psi_i\rangle \langle \psi_i|$$

Also for the probabilites must hold:

$$1 = \sum_i p_i$$

For your second question, the states are not required to be orthogonal nor form a complete orthonormal system, but they are required to be normalized.

I hope that helps you.

Edit: For question 1 you should probably also consider writing out the trace using a complete orthonormal system of states e.g. the eigenstates of the density matrix.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. I understand the different expressions for a pure state and mixed state but regarding my answers, did I write the correct matrix density for each system? My confusion arises in trying to understand if $\rho_A$ is pure and $\rho_B$ is mixed $\endgroup$ – s.twenty Nov 10 '19 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ I am not 100% sure with this, but I would say that the density matrix in Experiment A is mixed, since it is probabilistic and that in experiment B, since you have m non-interacting quantum states, you have m pure density matricies. $\endgroup$ – Tera Nov 11 '19 at 4:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.