4
$\begingroup$

I know litte about the Navier-Stokes equations, but it seems to me that questions related to Navier-Stokes are more fundamental (e.g. do solutions exist for a set of initial conditions) than the ones that are usually aked for the equations of gravity.

Also, a lot of non-linear solutions for general relativity are known and classified according to their symmetries (Stephani, et al.: Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations). Do similar classifications exist for known solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations?

Is it possible to give arguments, why one set of equations is more difficult than the other, if this is actually the case?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ To get any reasonable answers for this question, you need to provide a definition of what "more difficult" is actually supposed to mean. What, specifically, makes one equation more difficult than another? $\endgroup$ – probably_someone Oct 16 at 13:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Interesting question. A couple of differences: (1) the Einstein field equations generically produce singularities from typical initial conditions (i.e., in some sense this has probability 1); (2) in the EFE, you don't have an underlying spacetime manifold on which this happens -- the manifold only comes about once you've already solved the equations. $\endgroup$ – Ben Crowell Oct 16 at 13:58
2
$\begingroup$

An interesting perspective on this question could be offered by works on fluid/gravity correspondence.

For example, see this paper:

Abstract

We show by explicit construction that for every solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation in $p+1$ dimensions, there is a uniquely associated “dual” solution of the vacuum Einstein equations in $p+2$ dimensions. The dual geometry has an intrinsically flat timelike boundary segment $\Sigma_c$ whose extrinsic curvature is given by the stress tensor of the Navier-Stokes fluid. We consider a “near-horizon” limit in which $\Sigma_c$ becomes highly accelerated. The near-horizon expansion in gravity is shown to be mathematically equivalent to the hydrodynamic expansion in fluid dynamics, and the Einstein equation reduces to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation. For $p=2$, we show that the full dual geometry is algebraically special Petrov type II. The construction is a mathematically precise realization of suggestions of a holographic duality relating fluids and horizons which began with the membrane paradigm in the 70's and resurfaced recently in studies of the AdS/CFT correspondence.

This allows one to establish a “dictionary” relating problems concerning Navier–Stokes equations with problems posed for Einstein equations in a higher dimensional spacetime. As the paper suggests:

… cosmic censorship could be related to global existence for Navier-Stokes or the scale separation characterizing turbulent flows related to radial separation in a spacetime geometry …

On the other hand, not every question that could be asked about Einstein equations is about the near-horizon expansion, so for some rather loose interpretation, the “complexity” of Einstein's field equations (in higher dimensions) is strictly greater than that of Navier–Stokes equations.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the nice reference. This will take me a step further. I'm tempted to say that Einstein's field equations are "more complex", if geometric perturbations on a particular background exhibit dynamics described by Navier-Stokes equations. I somehow expected something like this, knowing that the Einstein equations of higher dimensional compactifications can incorporate even classical Yang-Mills field equations. $\endgroup$ – p6majo Oct 17 at 13:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.