Experimentally, under the application of an external perpendicular magnetic field, we observe a change in the longitudinal resistance. However, in the theoretical development starting from the Drude model and applying Newton's law, we end up with a resistivity tensor whose longitudinal components don't depend on the magnetic field. So, what's the origin of such a change in the longitudinal resistance in the experiments? Is this misunderstanding due to the approximations of Drude's model that lead to such a simplification?

I understand that the application of a magnetic field somehow hinders the movement of electrons, but at the end what you get is an orbital movement, a circular motion. This means to me that the magnetic field produces always a perpendicular correction to the motion of the electron, meaning that it relates the direction of the current with the perpendicular one. Consequently, in the resistivity tensor , only the transverse components (off-diagonal) should depend on the field and not the longitudinal ones. So, what's the reason?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.