0
$\begingroup$

I do not understand why we can apply the Lorenz Gauge Condition in Helmholtz equation. What is its physical meaning? Any help is appreciated.

$\nabla\cdot \vec{A} + \mu_0\varepsilon_0\frac{∂\phi}{∂t} = 0$


SOLUTION:

We can describe electromagnetic fields as a function of the electromagnetic potentials through the following equations (delayed potential equations):

$\vec{B}=\nabla × \vec{A}$

$\vec{E}=-\nabla \phi - \frac{∂\vec{A}}{∂t}$

We can transform these electromagnetic potentials so that they continue fulfilling the previous equations. Making the following changes we will obtain the same electromagnetic fields but the potentials will lose their physical meaning. These transformations will allow us to solve simpler statements, like Helmholtz's equation.

Then we can rewrite the new potentials like:

$\vec{A'}=\vec{A}+\vec{\alpha}$

$\phi'=\phi+\beta$

As I mentioned before, these transformations will have to satisfy the delayed potential equations so:

$\vec{B}=\nabla × \vec{A'}=\nabla × (\vec{A}+\vec{\alpha})$

$\vec{E}=-\nabla \phi' - \frac{∂\vec{A'}}{∂t}=-\nabla (\phi+\beta)- \frac{∂(\vec{A}+\vec{\alpha})}{∂t}$

If we continue simplifying the following equations we obtain:

$\nabla ×\vec{\alpha}=0$; $\vec{\alpha}=\nabla\lambda$; $\beta=\frac{∂\lambda}{∂t}$

So finally we get:

$\vec{A'}=\vec{A}+\nabla\lambda$

$\phi'=\phi+\frac{∂\lambda}{∂t}$

Conclusion: we can find any electromagnetic potential that satisfies Maxwell's equations. So we will try to find potentials that ease the calculations. It is important to note that these transformations will lead to a loss of potencial's physical meaning. But we do not have to worry about the electromagnetic fields because they will remain the same.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The Maxwell equations are gauge invariant. If you choose the Lorenz gauge, instead of the free Maxwell equations you get an equation saying that the d'Alembertian of the potential vanishes. If then you choose a complex solution with temporal dependence $\exp(j\omega t)$ (I am not sure about the sign of the phase though), you get the Helmholtz equation.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Assuming $A$ is the vector potential and $\phi=\partial_{t}V$ is the scalar potential, the potentials are calculation aids. The physical fields are the $E$ and $B$ fields. Choosing the Lorenz gauge allows one to solve the coupled partial $2$-nd order differential equation for $A$ and $V$ by uncoupling $A$ and $V$ into two independent partial $2$-nd order differential equations.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The potentials are "calculation aids" no more than the Schrödinger equation is. $\endgroup$ – my2cts Nov 3 '19 at 0:30
  • $\begingroup$ @my2cts: it's a typo for Lorenz. And the E,B fields can solved directly from the differential equations with out the use of potentials. $\endgroup$ – Cinaed Simson Nov 3 '19 at 3:38
  • $\begingroup$ And hoe do you do quantum mechanics without potentials? You don't. $\endgroup$ – my2cts Nov 3 '19 at 6:43
  • $\begingroup$ @my2cts: the classical electromagnetic field has 6 degrees of freedom per point in space-time. In quantum mechanics, the electromagnetic field is a spin-1 field with 2 degrees of freedom per point. When nature serves you lemons, you make lemonade? In any case, this post is about Maxwell's equations. $\endgroup$ – Cinaed Simson Nov 3 '19 at 8:19
  • $\begingroup$ My comment is not about this post. It is about your statement on the EM potential. I disagree with it. $\endgroup$ – my2cts Nov 3 '19 at 9:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.