0
$\begingroup$

I am currently studying electrodynamic and came across the following vectoridentity, but I am unable to prove it:

$$ \vec{f} \times ( \nabla \times \vec{f} ) -\vec{f}(\nabla\cdot\vec{f}) = \nabla \cdot (1/2 \cdot f^2 \delta - \vec{f} \otimes \vec{f} ) $$

$$ \vec{f} \times (rot(\vec{f})) -\vec{f}(\nabla\cdot\vec{f})= div (1/2 \cdot f^2 E - \vec{f} \otimes \vec{f} ) $$

The second equation is the same as the first.

Edit: I totally forgot the term $ -\vec{f}(\nabla\cdot\vec{f}). $

$ \delta $ , E is the unit tensor (I first wrote it as Kronecker symbol $ \delta_{ij} $).

Switched + to - on the right side between the tensors.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

After your edit, the identity is now correct. A fast check with Mathematica gives indeed

enter image description here

Notice that here we must understand the divergence of the two-tensor as acting over each row vector. In index notation, this is:

\begin{equation} \partial_i \left( \frac{1}{2} \, f_k \, f_k \, \delta_{ji} \, - \, f_j \, f_i \right) \, = \, \epsilon_{jkl} \, f_k \, \epsilon_{lmn} \, \partial_m \,f_n \, - \, f_j \, \partial_k \, f_k \end{equation}

Use the contraction properties of the Levi-Civita symbol and you will be able to work it out.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

First equation is inconsistent. What are $i,j$? Why do they only appear on the right-hand side? Are you familiar with notation? Tensor product? I would suggest proving this component-by-component, at first. And then looking at Levi-Civitas ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi-Civita_symbol) and their contractions.

with Levi-Civitas you get (given trivial metric and in Cartesian coordinates):

$\mathbf{f}\times\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times\mathbf{f} = \mathbf{e}_i \epsilon_{ijk}\,f_j\, \epsilon_{kst} \,\partial_s f_t = \epsilon_{kij}\epsilon_{kst}\,\mathbf{e}_i f_j\partial_s f_t = \left(\delta_{is}\delta_{jt}-\delta_{it}\delta_{js}\right)\,\mathbf{e}_i f_j\partial_s f_t=\dots$

where $\mathbf{e}_{i=1,2,3}=\mathbf{\hat{x}},\,\mathbf{\hat{y}},\,\mathbf{\hat{z}}$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

You notation in the first expression does not make sense.

If we use standard index notation, we have, from the triple product identity $$ {\bf a}\times({\bf b}\times {\bf c}) ={\bf b}({\bf c}\cdot {\bf a}) - {\bf a}({\bf b}\cdot {\bf c}) $$ and bearing in mind that ${\bf b}\equiv \nabla$ acts only on "${\bf c}$" that $$ ({\bf f}\times(\nabla\times {\bf f}))_i= f_i (\partial_j f_j)-f_i(\partial _j f_j) = \frac 12 \partial_i (f_jf_j)-f_i(\partial _j f_j)\\ $$ $$ = \frac 12 \nabla |f|^2-({\bf f}\cdot \nabla){\bf f} $$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.