I'm taking an introductory course on meteorology and in the lecture notes there is an explanation of the Coriolis effect that confuses me. The components of a wind field are u, v and w: $\vec{U} = u \cdot \vec{i}+v \cdot \vec{j}+w \cdot \vec{k}$. The unit vectors are shown in this figure (the coordinate system is rotating with the earth and $\vec{k}$ is the vector perpendicular to $\vec{i}$ and $\vec{j}$):
Then, following a derivation, the change of each of these velocity components is given as a function of the rotational velocity of the earth, the latitude, the longitude and the other velocity components: $\left(\dfrac{du}{dt}\right)_{Coriolis} = 2 \cdot \Omega \cdot v \cdot sin(\phi) - 2 \cdot \Omega \cdot w \cdot cos(\phi)\\ \left(\dfrac{dv}{dt}\right)_{Coriolis} = -2 \cdot \Omega \cdot u \cdot sin(\phi)\\ \left(\dfrac{dw}{dt}\right)_{Coriolis} = 2 \cdot \Omega \cdot u \cdot cos(\phi)$
This first equation I understand just fine. For example, when moving away from the equator, your distance to earth's rotation axis decreases, so conservation of momentum requires your u-component of velocity to increase. This is represented by the first term in the RHS of the first equation. The second term tells us that by going straight up, our distance to earth's rotation axis increases and so our u-component of velocity must decrease. However, I fail to see how having a non-zero u-component of velocity causes your w or v-components of velocity to change (equations 2 and 3). Whether you're moving along the equator or running in a perfect circle around the north pole, to me it seems that angular momentum is conserved. Can anybody shed some light on this?