1
$\begingroup$

Gravitation by Charles W. Misner, Kip Throne and John Wheeler page 65 Exercise 2.5.

The book defined "energy" for a photon $E=-\mathbf p\cdot \mathbf u$ for subsection 2.8, which later explained as a "coordinate-free contacts". This was still understandable.(Notice that $c=1$ as usual, and both $p$ and $u$ here represent 4 momentum. )

However, in Exercise 2.5, the book used $E=-\mathbf p\cdot \mathbf u$ again for a particle of non-zero rest mass, where $\mathbf p$ was the particle's momentum with rest mass $m$, and $\mathbf u$ was the observer's 4 velocity.

Further, the book claimed that $|\vec{p}|=[(-\mathbf p\cdot \mathbf u)^2+(-\mathbf p\cdot \mathbf p)]^{1/2}$ was the momentum measured by the observer, with $|\vec{v}|=\frac{|\vec{p}|}{E}$ the ordinary velocity measured by the obsever.

Question:

  1. What does $E=-p\cdot u$ stand for in this context? (for massive particle) Is it really energy?

  2. Further, how was $E$ relate to $\vec{p}$ and $\vec{v}$? Especially, how was $\vec{p}$ and $\vec{v}$ calculated?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

What does $E=−p⋅u$ stand for in this context? (for massive particle) Is it really energy?

Let $c=1$ and signature metric be $(-,+,+,+)$.

In a momentarily comoving reference frame, $\mathbf u=(u^0,u^1,u^1,u^3)=(1,0,0,0)$ and hence $$-\mathbf p\cdot\mathbf u=-p^0u^0\eta_{00}=p^0=E$$ It is a four-vector expression and is preserved under Lorentz transformations. Hence, it indeed represents the energy.

Further, how was E related to p and v? Especially, how were p and v calculated?

Notice that $(\mathbf p\cdot \mathbf u)^2 = E^2 = m^2+p^2$ and $(\mathbf p \cdot \mathbf p)^2=-m^2$. Upon plugging them you derive, $$[(\mathbf p\cdot \mathbf u)^2+ (\mathbf p \cdot \mathbf p)^2]^\frac{1}{2} =[m^2+p^2-m^2]^\frac{1}{2} =|\vec p|$$

Also, $|\vec p| = m\gamma(v_x,v_y,v_z)$ and hence $\dfrac{|\vec p|}{E}=\dfrac{|\vec p|}{p_0} = \dfrac{m\gamma(v_x,v_y,v_z)}{m\gamma}=\vec v$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thank you, but what if they are not in the MCRF? Will it be different? $\endgroup$ – ShoutOutAndCalculate Oct 3 '19 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ @user9976437 These are four-vectors and are invariant under Lorentz transformation. Yes, it will hold even in other inertial frames too. To derive directly in a general frame of reference, you can make use of the rapidity and $E = m\gamma$. It is easier to derive expressions in MCRF and if they are four-vectors, it stands true in other inertial frames too. $\endgroup$ – Abhay Hegde Oct 4 '19 at 12:57
1
$\begingroup$

This answer is meant to complement exp ikx's answer. I'm just trying to get you to see these expressions in various ways.

Let $\bf \hat u$ be the 4-velocity of the observer. Let $\bf p$ be the 4-momentum of the particle.
With the $(-,+,+,+)$ convention, $\bf \hat u\cdot \hat u=-1$ and ${\bf p\cdot p}=-m^2$

So, think of $\bf -p \cdot \hat u$ as the observer measuring the time-component of the particle's 4-momentum [in the observer frame, of course]. Introducing the rapidity $\theta$ between their 4-velocities $\bf \hat u$ and ${\bf \hat p}={\bf p}/m$, we have $$-{\bf p \cdot u}=m\cosh\theta=\gamma m=(\mbox{relativistic energy} E) $$ Note \begin{align} \bf p &=\bf p_{\textrm{parallel to u}}+p_{\textrm{perp to u}}\\ &=\bf (-p\cdot u)\hat u + (p-(-p\cdot u)\hat u)\\ &=\bf (\textrm{$E$})\hat u+ (\textrm{$p_x$})\hat u_{\bot}\\ &=\bf \textrm{$m$}\cosh\theta\ {\hat u} + \textrm{$m$}\sinh\theta\ { \hat u_{\bot}}\\ &=\bf \textrm{$m$}\cosh\theta( \hat u + \tanh\theta\ \hat u_{\bot})\\ &=\bf \textrm{$m$}\gamma( \hat u + \beta\ \hat u_{\bot})\\ \end{align}

$$\beta=\tanh\theta=\frac{p_x}{E}=\frac{m\sinh\theta}{m\cosh\theta}$$ $$-m^2=-E^2+p^2=-(m\cosh\theta)^2+(m\sinh\theta)^2=-m^2(\cosh^2\theta-\sinh^2\theta)$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.