# If A Very Distant Galaxy Has Never Been Observable By Us, Then It Never Will Be? [duplicate]

I understand that distant galaxies that are currently inside our particle horizon will, sometime in the future, not be observable by us anymore because they are receding faster than the particle horizon is expanding. I guess, put another way, if a distant galaxy, that we can see today (is currently inside of our particle horizon), has been outside of our event horizon since time $$t$$, then we will stop seeing that galaxy (it will be outside of our particle horizon) once all the light it emitted before $$t$$ arrives here.

Does that mean that if a galaxy in our universe has never been observable by us (i.e., none of the light that it emitted, at anytime in the past, has ever reached us), then none of the light that it emitted, at anytime in the past, will reach us in the future?

A similar question might be: if none of the light that it emitted, at anytime in the past, is reaching us now, then none of the light that it emitted, at anytime in the past, will reach us in the future?

I have not seen another question put quite this way, so I do not think that it is a duplicate, but if it is, I apologize. I did try to research this on this site, before posting.