-2
$\begingroup$

It’s well known that quintic 3-fold is a Calabi-Yau manifold in the complex projective space $\mathbb{CP}^{n+1}$ , see for instance:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintic_threefold

Now the main feature of Calabi–Yau manifold that it has vanishing Ricci tensor $R_{\mu\nu}=0$ , so the Ricci scalar vanishes as well.

But when I was studying the Quintic from this paper:

https://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~beuke106/HypergeometricFunctions/COGP.pdf

I have found in figure 10, the Ricci scalar has been plotted.

So how is that? do I miss something here?

Another question, in general, if I’m studying CY 3-fold in the context of string theory decomposition, for instance, can I take the metric of the quintic driven in that paper, equ. (4.3) , to explore CY’s complex space structure?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think you are confusing things between the Calabi-Yau and its moduli space. The complex structure moduli and Kähler moduli of the Calabi-Yau, both respectivly parametrize a manifold, which are Special Kähler manifolds. The plots are for a moduli space. $\endgroup$ – Sparticle Sep 23 '19 at 23:11
  • $\begingroup$ No. I don’t think I’m confusing or any thing. I know what are you saying very well. So don’t explain for me please the very basics of CY manifold. The question is very specific if you got it , the plot in figure 10 says a plot of the Ricci scalar against.... etc, have you seen that? @Sparticle $\endgroup$ – S.S. Sep 24 '19 at 1:31
2
$\begingroup$

On page 50, it says

we note that for a one-dimensional manifold that is special Kahler, the Ricci scalar is related to the invariant coupling by $R+4=2\gamma_\text{inv}^2$ and we present a three-dimensional plot of the Ricci scalar in fig. 10

On page 55, it says

for large $\psi$, the Ricci scalar of the moduli space differs from its limiting value by inverse powers of log $\psi$ as is evident from fig. 9

The bolding is mine, not theirs, to emphasize that the authors are not talking about the Ricci scalar of the Calabi-Yau manifold itself. As you rightly pointed out, its Ricci scalar vanishes.

Thus I believe that @Sparticle's comment was correct: the plots of a Ricci scalar in figures 9 and 10 are for the Ricci scalar of a moduli space.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What do you think about this if you have any idea about? physics.stackexchange.com/questions/504412/… $\endgroup$ – S.S. Sep 24 '19 at 12:10
  • $\begingroup$ @S.S. Sorry, string theory and CY manifolds are not among my areas of expertise, so I can’t answer that question. I answered this question just by careful reading of what the authors wrote about the figures in question, not by actually understanding moduli spaces. $\endgroup$ – G. Smith Sep 24 '19 at 15:47
  • $\begingroup$ So that forms had been made! I have said in the question already, I may have missed something about, so thank you!! And that’s also new area for me, so I wasn’t see a point to calculate R for only the moduli space . Any ways didn’t mean any offend @Sparticle , @G.smith $\endgroup$ – S.S. Sep 24 '19 at 16:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.