1
$\begingroup$

I know there are a variety of questions about this topic but I have been searching the internet for a long time and couldn't find a proper answer. The question is simple:

I saw the following formula in my professor's notes for Planck's formula:

$$I(\nu,T) = \dfrac{2\pi h \nu^3}{c^2} \dfrac{h\nu}{e^{h\nu/kT}-1} .$$

However, wherever I look I have seen it in a form such that:

$$I(\nu,T) = \dfrac{2\pi h \nu^3}{c^2} \dfrac{1}{e^{h\nu/kT}-1} .$$

Simply without a $h\nu$ term. Why? What is the difference exactly? Was my professor just make a mistake?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I don’t recognize the first formula. My guess is that it’s a mistake. I suggest asking your professor. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Sep 17, 2019 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ I will, as soon as possible. Then I will update it. $\endgroup$
    – Etg
    Sep 18, 2019 at 21:04
  • $\begingroup$ What is $I$ in the first place? Intensity of what? Power? Energy per frequency? $\endgroup$
    – Cham
    Oct 4, 2019 at 17:15

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

It turnes out to be a mistake by the professor. Second formula is correct.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.