1
$\begingroup$

Dirac equation is always written with indices. Is there any way to write it down without any indices ABSTRACT or not, and without coordinates,basis vectors etc..?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Always? $/ \!\!\!\partial$ . $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Sep 17 at 16:35
  • $\begingroup$ How can you have a differential equation for a function on spacetime without having any coordinates to express where you are in spacetime? $\endgroup$ – G. Smith Sep 17 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ No, you don’t need indices. Just write it out using $t,x,y,z$ derivatives. $\endgroup$ – G. Smith Sep 17 at 16:38
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ There is, although doing it carefully requires introduction of spinor bundles. See ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Dirac+operator for example. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kravchuk Sep 17 at 16:45
  • $\begingroup$ This is still in component form exactly the opposite of what I want. It's not about being invariant under component of frame transformations , it's about being completely coordinateless as I specified in the question. $\endgroup$ – Leo Kovacic Sep 18 at 8:18
1
$\begingroup$

Writing out $\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu$ is really no different than writing anything that looks like an inner product (for example, the Laplacian). If you're concerned that the indices don't make the frame-independence obvious, then just write it as a four-vector dot product: $$ (i\gamma\cdot\partial - m)\psi = 0. $$

I'm not saying that this notation is usual, or even that you will find it anywhere, but it seems no different to me than writing, say, $\nabla \times \nabla f = 0$ or $\nabla \cdot \nabla \phi = -\rho$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ok so why don't you write it down exactly as you did the last line if it's all the same.. $\endgroup$ – Leo Kovacic Sep 18 at 7:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.