1
$\begingroup$

I'm currently working through Schwartz's QFT book, and I'm trying to find the energy-momentum tensor for the following Lagrangian:

$$ L = -\frac{1}2\phi(\Box+m^2)\phi. $$

Am I correct in thinking that,

$$ \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\phi)} = 0$$

owing to the fact that there are no first derivatives of $\phi $ in the Lagrangian? This seems to disagree with a solution set that I found for the book, hence why I'm asking here, just to be sure.

The other option I see is that

$$ \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\phi)} = -\frac{1}{2}\phi\partial^{\nu}\delta_{\mu\nu}$$ but I'm not sure why this would be true and the other not.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Your operator $\Box$ can be expressed via $\partial^\mu \partial_\mu$, so that you can write the Lagranian density $\mathcal{L}$ as $$\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu \Phi \partial^\mu \Phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \Phi^2$$

Therefore, the answer to your question is $$\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu \Phi)} = \partial_\mu \Phi$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Cool, I had also considered that. And I assume that's because we can express $ -\phi\Box\phi $ as $ \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi $, assuming the total derivative term vanishes? $\endgroup$ – samcarter Sep 10 '19 at 12:53
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean? Honestly I have never seen your Lagrangian. I mean, you have $(\Box + m^2)\Phi$ which is zero due to the Klein-Gordon equation and if i remember correctly you have the choice to choose your Lagrangian to be zero. This could be a way of getting yours. $\endgroup$ – Jan2103 Sep 10 '19 at 12:59
  • $\begingroup$ So, $ \phi\Box\phi = \phi\partial_{\mu}^2\phi = \partial_{\mu}(\phi\partial_{\mu}\phi) - \partial^{\mu}\phi\partial_{\mu}\phi $. The total derivative $ \partial_{\mu}(\phi\partial_{\mu}\phi) $ can then be dropped as per Schwartz: "our fields vanish on these asymptotic boundaries, which lets us drop [...] total derivatives from Lagrangians." $\endgroup$ – samcarter Sep 10 '19 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I get it. Thought about something else by total derivative. $\endgroup$ – Jan2103 Sep 10 '19 at 13:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.