0
$\begingroup$

In Mahan eq. 1.193 I see an expression for the second quantized current operator of the form:

$$j(r)=\frac{e}{2mi}[\psi^\dagger(r)\nabla\psi(r)-\psi(r)\nabla\psi^\dagger(r)]$$

However, in other online sources I instead see expressions like

$$j(r)=\frac{e}{2mi}[\psi^\dagger(r)\nabla\psi(r)-(\nabla\psi^\dagger(r))\psi(r)]$$

Are these expressions equivalent? It seems to me that the $\psi(r)$ and $\nabla\psi^\dagger(r)$ do not commute, so I am surprised to see both definitions in different places online.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The right definition is the one that makes $j(r)$ hermitian. That should not be too difficult to check. $\endgroup$ – Hans Moleman Sep 7 at 22:47
1
$\begingroup$

The correct definition is the first one, you can easily check that it gives a physically correct hermitian current density $j(r) = j(r)^\dagger$. As hinted by Hans Moleman in the comment to your question.

Online resources might be quoting the second expression as a special case, only valid in certain situations. $\psi(r)$ and $\nabla\psi(r)$ do commute, for instance, for $\psi(r) = \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(kr-\omega t)}$.
In general, any spin-$0$ particle/field, described by a scalar, will obey the commutation relation. And usually spin-$0$ are the first things books do when explaining QFT and second quantisation, so I would not be surprised if that's the case for the resources you are looking at.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.