0
$\begingroup$

In my understanding, not only mass but any kind of energy/ force bends spacetime. So is it correct to say that every object in the world moves along geodesic? If the object is submit to a force, it will not feel an acceleration: the force will bend the underlying spacetime --> the geodesic of the object will change --> its worldline in spacetime will change, but only because the curvature of spacetime has changed. It will still move along a geodesic. So acceleration, in some sense, simply doesn't exist anymore.

Is this interpretation correct?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm sure this has already been answered somewhere on Physics SE, but I don't know where, so I'll post a quick hint: Worldlines that are geodesics describe free-fall; an observer following such a worldline feels weightless. Worldlines that are not geodesics describe deviations from free-fall, and such an observer feels weight. $\endgroup$ – Chiral Anomaly Aug 29 '19 at 13:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Chiral Yes but my question is how a worldline cannot be a geodesic? If there is any force, it will simply change the curvature and so the geodesic path of the particle will change as well. But it will still be a geodesic curve. Where am I going wrong? $\endgroup$ – Federico Toso Aug 29 '19 at 13:51
  • $\begingroup$ Federico, when I read "its worldline in spacetime will change, but only because the curvature of spacetime has changed", the impression I get is that you haven't conceptualized spacetime correctly. Reading "It will still move along a geodesic" strengthens that impression. Are you picturing an object as moving in spacetime? $\endgroup$ – Alfred Centauri Aug 29 '19 at 15:55
  • $\begingroup$ @alfred Yes I am. Is this wrong? Isn't a worldline traced by the motion of a particle through spacetime? $\endgroup$ – Federico Toso Aug 29 '19 at 15:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Federio, if you're thinking of a point particle as point moving on a worldline in spacetime, then yes, I believe this is wrong. For example, see this answer from Ben Crowell: "Objects don't move through spacetime. Objects move through space. If you depict an object in spacetime, you have a world-line. The world-line doesn't move through spacetime, it simply extends across spacetime." - In other words, the depiction of a point particle in spacetime is not as a point but, rather, a curve in spacetime $\endgroup$ – Alfred Centauri Aug 29 '19 at 16:31
4
$\begingroup$

Not every force is manifested through the curvature of spacetime, only gravity. Take the electromagnetic field, for example. It has energy-momentum density, so it affects the gravitational field and hence the movement of particles. But this is not the only effect it has: on a charged particle, it also acts directly through the electromagnetic force.

Mathematically, for a particle of mass $m$ and charge $q$ in an EM field $F_{\mu\nu}$, the geodesic equation is modified to

$$\frac{d u^\mu}{d\tau} + \Gamma^\mu{}_{\nu\lambda} u^\nu u^\lambda = \frac{q}{m} F^\mu{}_\nu u^\nu.$$

If there was no electromagnetic field, the right hand side would be zero, and you would just have the geodesic equation with the gravitational field $\Gamma^\mu{}_{\nu\lambda}$. If there is an EM field, then two things happen. For one, its energy-momentum influences the gravitational field, so that $\Gamma^\mu{}_{\nu\lambda}$ changes. But it also directly applies a force on the particle, given by the right hand side of the equation, and this effect is usually much bigger. The particle doesn't follow a geodesic anymore.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.