0
$\begingroup$

How can uncertainty be represented as a chance when we write in Heisenberg's principle? Why do we use Delta for uncertainty and mathematically use it the same way as if it was a change in position or momentum?

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Emilio Pisanty, Thomas Fritsch, Jon Custer, John Rennie, Kyle Kanos Aug 27 at 11:56

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How can uncertainty be represented as a chance... should that "chance" be "change"? $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Aug 26 at 11:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Why do we use Delta for uncertainty and mathematically use it the same way as if it was a change in position or momentum?" ─ we don't. What gave you that impression? $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Aug 26 at 12:02
1
$\begingroup$

When analyzing measurements of a continuous quantity like position or momentum, the only complete description of the measurement comes from specifying the full probability density function $p(x)$ for measuring a particle at any position $x$. It's called the probability density because it is used as follows: the probability $P(x_1\leq x\leq x_2)$ of measuring an object to be within the interval $[x_1,x_2]$ is given by

$$P(x_1\leq x\leq x_2)=\int_{x_1}^{x_2}p(x)\;dx$$

In this way, it behaves much like any other density function, like the mass density - to find the mass contained in a given volume, you integrate the mass density over that volume.

This probability density function contains quite a bit of information, just like any other PDF in statistics. But, just like in statistics, in many cases we only need a small portion of the information contained in the full distribution, ideally expressed as a single number, to compare distributions that may be otherwise nontrivial to compare. In this case we want a number that describes roughly how wide a particular distribution is; the wider the distribution, the less certain we are about a measurement's value. This number is what we call the "uncertainty" in a particular measurement, and it is defined as follows, for example for a position distribution:

$$\Delta x=\sqrt{\langle x^2\rangle-\langle x\rangle ^2}$$

where

$$\langle Q\rangle = \int Qp(x)\; dx$$

for some quantity $Q$. As you can see, the uncertainty $\Delta x$ "throws away" a lot of the information about the distribution by averaging over it, but it turns out to still be useful as a general description of how wide a probability distribution is.

The notation $\Delta x$ also makes sense: it's a measure of roughly how much you can expect the value of $x$ to change between different measurements.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure about your final statement. Are you talking about repeatedly measuring the same system? If so, then how can you guarantee that $\Delta x$ is the same before the first measurement and then after subsequent measurements. If you are talking about measuring different systems that start in the same state, then $\Delta x$ would just be what you describe in your answer: a standard deviation of the measurement. I am not sure you could say you would expect one measurement to be $\Delta x$ away from the next one. $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Aug 26 at 13:44
  • $\begingroup$ @AaronStevens I meant to basically say "a standard deviation of the measurement" without saying the words "standard deviation". And I don't necessarily mean adjacent measurements, either; the meaning is closer to "the range over which the measured value of $x$ is expected to differ/vary/change when you measure many copies of the same system." $\endgroup$ – probably_someone Aug 26 at 14:29

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.