Using the wedge product one can pair the generators the Clifford algebra $Cl_{1,3}(\mathbb{R})$ to produce 2-vectors (area elements).

The Nambu-Goto action is a statement on the evolution of invariant area elements of the space-time metric.

Is it appropriate to use these 2-vectors to formulate the Nambu-Goto action.

The possible 2-vectors of $Cl_{1,3}(\mathbb{R})$ are:

$$ \gamma_0\gamma_1,\; \gamma_0\gamma_2,\; \gamma_0\gamma_3,\; \gamma_1\gamma_2,\; \gamma_1\gamma_3,\; \gamma_2\gamma_3 $$

The first three bi-vectors are wedge products involving time $t$ wedge a position $x,y$ or $z$. Intuitively they appear relevant to the Nambu-Goto action.

Can we obtain the Nambu-Goto action using the Lagrangian of an invariant sum of area elements:

$$ S=\int \mathrm dt\, \mathrm dx\, \mathrm dy\,\mathrm dz \sqrt{\left( A(t,x) \gamma_0 \wedge \gamma_1 \right)^2 + \left( B(t,y) \gamma_0 \wedge \gamma_2 \right)^2 + \left( C(t,z) \gamma_0 \wedge \gamma_3 \right)^2} $$

Or, perhaps one should use another combination of 2-vectors?

  • $\begingroup$ What is the square root of a Clifford matrix, what is the motivation for randomly sticking in Clifford elements into a square root of a well-defined quantity, what would happen if you did this in a QFT context for a point particle. $\endgroup$ – bolbteppa Aug 25 '19 at 19:27

OP considers a field theory in 3+1D, while the Nambu-Goto string action is a field theory in 1+1D. OP probably has a $p$-brane action $$ S_p~=~-T_0\int d^{p+1}\sigma ~\sqrt{-\det\left(\partial_{\alpha} X\cdot \partial_{\beta} X\right)_{\alpha\beta}} $$ in mind. FWIW, as long as spinor variables doesn't enter the theory, it seems likely that Clifford calculus and gamma matrices are not needed.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.