I am learning the Carnot cycle, which consists of four transformations for a fluid.
In the first two transformations the volume of the fluid expands, generating work.
This happens in two steps:
- First, we approach a hot source and the gas expands and work is generated (okay, temperature increases and fluid wants to expand → the generated work comes 100% from the consumed heat, because the internal energy did not change during the isothermal process)
- Then we remove the hot source and the gas is supposed to keep expanding (Question A: Not really sure how the gas keeps expanding after we remove the hot source. If no heat source is close, it seems logic to expect that the expansion will just stop. Why would it want to continue? Expansion means work done. Since there is no heat flow, the gas would be losing internal energy. Why would the gas want to lose internal energy to create work?).
In the second two transformations the volume of the fluid decreases.
This happens in two steps:
- First, we approach a cold source, so the fluid naturally flushes some heat away to the cold source and hence decreases its temperature and hence decreases its volume. (That is quite reasonable).
- Finally, the fluid keeps compressing, automatically increasing its temperature and pressure, coming back to state number 1 (Question B: How can expect the fluid to keep being compressed automatically? Being this an adiabatic process and an increase in temperature, this means work must be done on the system. Who is doing this work?).
1 and 3 are based on putting a thermal source close to the fluid so nature will do what it does, according to the second law.
But 2 and 4 seem like magic to me, since I don't understand what goes on behind the scenes.
There is a similar question but I still don't get it. Thought it was better to create a new question, rather than commenting on an old one. Also, this way I can expose my complete point of view on the case.
I would also like to understand how this relates to the efficiency of the carnot cycle.
Which comes from something like:
$$\dfrac{GeneratedWork}{GivenEnergy}=\dfrac{HeatIn-HeatOut}{HeatIn}$$
This is understandable but then it goes on like:
$$\dfrac{HeatIn-HeatOut}{HeatIn} = 1 - \dfrac{T_{cold}}{T_{hot}}$$
There are two confusions with this:
Question C.
How is it possible to mix heat and temperature in such an easy way?
This is almost like saying that heat = temperature.
Also, I understood heat is never absolute, but a variation. While temperature is actually an absolute measure.
Question D.
If 4 actually requires external work for the compression, how come is this applied work not reflected in the efficiency? (maybe it is, but I do not see it)
UPDATE:
This video is very helpful: https://youtu.be/d6eJ8mccvu0&t=939