Trying to understand spin in quantum mechanics I'm trying to understand the concept of spin in Quantum Mechanics. I'm reading "Road to Reality" by Penrose, which despite not being a textbook, is reputed to give one a deep insight into physical processes.


*

*Let us suppose that we have a spin $\frac{1}{2}$ particle. It has two eigenstates- $|\uparrow\rangle$ and $|\downarrow\rangle$. I would assume that spin $S$ is an operator such that when it acts on the wavefunction $\alpha |\uparrow\rangle+\beta|\downarrow\rangle$, it collapses it to one eigenstate, with an eigenvalue which would be the spin (so $\frac{1}{2}$ here). However, Penrose says that the spin can be thought of as the point $[\alpha:\beta]$ in $\Bbb{C}P^1$. 


Why is this? Why do we not have a collapse to an eigenstate?


*Let us suppose that we have a particle with spin $j$. Then $N=2j$. An angular momentum eigenstate of such a particle can be written as $\psi_{AB\dots N}$. I know that there are $N+1$ independent eigenstates, and that for even values of $N$, the eigenstates are spherical harmonic functions while for odd values of $N$ the eigenstates are spin-weighted spherical harmonic functions. 


But how do you calculate the spin of this particle? One might say that the spin is just $j$. However, from the example of spin $\frac{1}{2}$, I would figure that the spin is suppose to be an element of a projective space. Is this not true?
 A: You're confusing the measurement of an operator $\hat{\cal O}$ - which collapses the wave function to one of the eigenstates of $\hat{\cal O}$ - with a state, which can be a general linear combination of eigenstates of $\hat{\cal O}$.
In the case of spin (or more generally angular momentum) we speak of spin-$s$ when the largest possible eigenvalue is $\hbar s$.  Thus a spin-1 particle can have eigenvalue $\pm \hbar$ or $0\hbar$.   
Note that the direction of the angular quantization axis is irrelevant since any direction is equally good as any other.  Thus, the possible eigenvalues of spin along $\hat x$, i.e. the eigenvalues of $\hat S_x$ are the same the eigenvalues of $\hat S_z$.  This does NOT mean the eigenstates are the same: just the eigenvalues are the same.  You can verify for yourself that the linear combinations 
$$
\vert\psi_\pm\rangle=\vert \uparrow \rangle \pm \vert \downarrow\rangle
$$
of eigenstates of $\hat S_z$ are actually eigenstates of $\hat S_y$.
A general spin-1/2 state will be a linear combination
$$
\vert \psi\rangle =\alpha \vert \uparrow\rangle+\beta\vert\downarrow\rangle.
$$
can be represented as a point on $\mathbb{CP}$ as in the Bloch sphere.
