-1
$\begingroup$

I have found a proof of Liouville's theorem on the internet, which fits me very well except one step I don't understand, the derivation is as follows:

enter image description here

In the derivative, it must have used the relation $dq'_i=dq_i+\frac{\partial\dot{q}_i}{\partial q_i}dq_idt$ and $dp'_i=dp_i+\frac{\partial\dot{p}_i}{\partial p_i}dp_idt$ which I don't understand. Since in the Hamiltonian's formalism, the independent variables are $q$'s and $p$'s, why $dq_i'$ not equal to $dq_i+\sum_j\frac{\partial\dot{q}_i}{\partial q_j}dq_jdt + \sum_j\frac{\partial\dot{q}_i}{\partial p_j}dp_jdt$, etc?

$\endgroup$
10
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I guess you do have the additional term which you listed at the end. However, as $d\Gamma$ is a volume form, such additional terms do not contribute. $\endgroup$
    – chichi
    Aug 14 '19 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ @chichi Please write your comment as an explicit answer if you have time. Three votes up to your answer, however I don't know what you are talking about. Those terms have the exactly same dimensionality $\endgroup$ Aug 14 '19 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ Please don't cut and paste on the internet without crediting the author. It's rude. $\endgroup$
    – user4552
    Jan 9 '20 at 21:12
  • $\begingroup$ We don't delete questions at the request of users, as that wastes the effort that other people have put into answering the question. In any case, if you have a pressing reason you think something should be deleted, you should flag it for moderator attention using the "flag" button under the post rather than vandalizing it. $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Jan 10 '20 at 2:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris I know the rule, but I have the right to edit the question so no one knows what I am talking about. $\endgroup$ Jan 11 '20 at 1:23
0
$\begingroup$

Consider \begin{equation} d\Gamma' = \left( dq_1 + \frac{\partial\dot{q}_1}{\partial q_1}dq_1dt + \cdots + \frac{\partial\dot{q}_1}{\partial p_1}dp_1dt + \cdots \right) \left( dq_2 + \cdots \right) \cdots (dp_1+\cdots)(dp_{3N}+\cdots) \end{equation} where the omitted dots are the remaining terms in your correct expansion \begin{equation} dq'_i = dq_i + \sum_j \frac{\partial\dot{q}_i}{\partial q_j}dq_j dt + \sum_j \frac{\partial\dot{q}_i}{\partial p_j} dp_jdt. \end{equation} Now we want to expand the expression of $d\Gamma'$ up to the first order in $dt$. That means we can only choose one $dt$ term in each bracket. Consider we choose $dt$ factor from the first bracket. If we choose \begin{equation} \frac{\partial\dot{q}_1}{\partial q_1}dq_1dt \end{equation} from the first bracket, then all other brackets should contribute terms like $dq_2,\cdots$ and this leads to your (2.19).

Suppose we instead choose a term in linear $dt$ like \begin{equation} \frac{\partial\dot{q}_1}{\partial p_1}dp_1dt. \end{equation} Again, other brackets should contribute something without $dt$ and these can only be $dq_2,\cdots$ and also the term $dp_1$. However, the volume form is a top form, you can't have $dp_1$ show up twice, therefore, these terms do not contribute.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ What if we instead choose a term in linear dt like $\frac{\partial\dot{q}_1}{\partial q_2}dq_2dt. $ $\endgroup$ Aug 15 '19 at 3:18
  • $\begingroup$ Then the $dq_2$ term from the second bracket will kill it. $\endgroup$
    – chichi
    Aug 15 '19 at 3:23
  • $\begingroup$ Why kill it .... $\endgroup$ Aug 15 '19 at 4:14
  • $\begingroup$ What prevent $(dq_2)^2$ from entering into the equation? $\endgroup$ Aug 15 '19 at 11:29
  • $\begingroup$ $(dq_2)^2 = 0$ because $dq_2 \wedge dq_2 = 0$. $\endgroup$
    – chichi
    Aug 15 '19 at 12:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.