0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to build an optical logic circuit using the horizontal or vertical orientations of light as the two binary states and laser as the source. Before I ask you my question I wanted to first share how I designed the NOT Gate. enter image description here

NOT Gate To explain the working let's assume I send in a horizontally oriented beam of light. This beam splits into two beams. Because it is horizontally oriented, the first split beam won't enter the V Polarizer and gets blocked. The second split beam enters the H Polarizer and consequently gets vertically oriented at the end and the lower ldr detects the light, notifying us that it is now in V state.

My Problem Now, I am not able to figure out another combination of polarizers for AND and OR Gate. Can anyone help me in giving me a lead?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Norbert Schuch, Jon Custer, ZeroTheHero, Kyle Kanos, Aaron Stevens Aug 26 at 18:55

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:

  • "This question appears to be about engineering, which is the application of scientific knowledge to construct a solution to solve a specific problem. As such, it is off topic for this site, which deals with the science, whether theoretical or experimental, of how the natural world works. For more information, see this meta post." – Kyle Kanos, Aaron Stevens
  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – Jon Custer, ZeroTheHero
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ You don't even say what the logical 0 and 1 are. How should one answer the question? $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Aug 14 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ I have mentioned that in the second and third line. Read properly. $\endgroup$ – Bhavesh Aug 15 at 18:14
  • $\begingroup$ I see. (Note that "second and third line" depends on the screen!). But then, why don't you just use a lambda/2 plate for the not gate? Your setup seems unnecessarily complicated! $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Aug 15 at 18:38
  • $\begingroup$ I don't have access to wave plates, only linear polarizers $\endgroup$ – Bhavesh Aug 16 at 14:28
2
$\begingroup$

You’ll need the state of one beam to affect the state of another. This is a nonlinear effect requiring a potentially complex arrangement of optics and materials to make it efficient enough to be practical. First, read about nonlinear optics, then try looking up all-optical switches, for example. You won’t be able to do it with a few polarizers since they are linear optical elements.

Also, you can improve your NOT gate by switching your design with a single half-waveplate oriented at 45$^\circ$. This new design would be 100% efficient.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.