0
$\begingroup$

Recently, I am following the paper arXiv:1610.01803 to study superfluid weight. In this paper the diamagnetic current is given by:

$j^D_{\mu}(\vec{q})=\sum_{\vec{k},\sigma}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}H(\vec{k},\sigma)c^{\dagger}_{\vec{k},\sigma}c_{\vec{k}+\vec{q},\sigma}A_{\mu}(\vec{q})=T_{\mu\nu}A_{\nu}$

But I met problems when I try to transform this into the Nambu field: $\langle T_{\mu\nu}\rangle=\sum_{\vec{k}}\langle c^{\dagger}_{\vec{k}\uparrow}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}H_{\uparrow}(\vec{k})c_{\vec{k}\uparrow}+c^{\dagger}_{\vec{k}\downarrow}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}H_{\downarrow}(\vec{k})c_{\vec{k}\downarrow}\rangle\\ =\sum_{\vec{k}}\langle c^{\dagger}_{\vec{k}\uparrow}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}H_{\uparrow}(\vec{k})c_{\vec{k}\uparrow}-c_{\vec{-k}\downarrow}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}H^{*}_{\downarrow}(\vec{-k})c^{\dagger}_{\vec{-k}\downarrow}+\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}H^{*}_{\downarrow}(\vec{-k})\rangle$

while in arXiv:1610.01803, authors seems dropped the last term. In their paper, they obtained: $\langle T_{\mu\nu}\rangle=\sum_{\vec{k}}\langle\psi^{\dagger}_{\vec{k}}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}H_{BdG}(\vec{k})\psi_{\vec{k}}\rangle$, and $\psi_{\vec{k}}=(c_{\vec{k},\uparrow},c^{\dagger}_{-\vec{k},\uparrow})^T$ is the Nambu field.

I understand why we can drop similar term in the BdG Hamiltonian. But why can we still drop this in the diamagnetic current operators?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.