Is it possible for a particle to decay via gravity? I know gravity is immensely weaker than the other forces, but all the other forces interact with particles. Do we need an understanding of quantum gravity to know if this is possible? Are there any theories where this is possible?


The closest I have seen is decay through virtual black holes.

This paper, for example, works out proton decay rates due to black holes if there are extra large dimensions. The paper starts by heuristically estimating the lifetime in normal space-time, estimating the lifetime as $\tau \sim \frac{1}{m_p}\left(\frac{M_{Pl}}{m_p}\right)^4 \sim 10^{45}$ years. Since we do not have a proper quantum field theory doing the full decay calculation is not possible yet; how much to trust the heuristic argument remains to be seen. There are plenty of potential complications.

  • $\begingroup$ A meson made of quark and antiquark of the same flavor should also be able to decay into gravitons, very analogously to how it decays into photons. $\endgroup$ – Mitchell Porter Jul 30 '19 at 23:28
  • $\begingroup$ @MitchellPorter - Yes, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00670356 seems to bring up this possibility. $\endgroup$ – Anders Sandberg Jul 31 '19 at 5:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As the empirical lower bound on the proton's lifetime continue to rise, a $10^{-45}/\text{year}$ decay rate may become significant. Very interesting. I'm surprised it comes out that high. $\endgroup$ – J.G. Jul 31 '19 at 9:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @J.G. That decay rate comes from estimating how often two of the proton's valence quarks should get close enough to each other, for an event horizon to form around them. The very concept sounds wrong to me, but I don't have a definite alternative model. $\endgroup$ – Mitchell Porter Jul 31 '19 at 9:41

Is it possible for a particle to decay via gravity?

This is not the case in the Standard Model, which does not include gravity.

This is also not the case in General Relativity, which doesn't have a particle based mechanism for particle decay, although General Relativity does recognize that the relativistic mass of a system can change in a conversion of gravitational energy to other kinds of matter-energy, or visa versa, under certain circumstances at a macroscopic level.

It is conceivable that particle decay via gravity could happen in a realistic theory of quantum gravity. But, certainly, there is no credible experimental evidence of such a decay being observed in the real world at this time. Since that would possibly be very hard to observe, however, this isn't necessarily remarkable and doesn't necessarily imply strongly that it isn't possible.

I know gravity is immensely weaker than the other forces, but all the other forces interact with particles. Do we need an understanding of quantum gravity to know if this is possible?

Yes. We do need an understanding of quantum gravity to know if this is possible, since it is not otherwise possible, and understanding an inherently quantum gravitational concept requires an understanding of quantum gravity.

While there are numerous proposals for quantum gravity theories, none of them have achieved consensus support or even really credible claims that they are likely to be a correct theory of quantum gravity. So, the short answer is that we don't know and probably aren't very close to knowing.

This said, there are many qualitative assumptions that are typically made about broad general classes of quantum gravity theories that can help us to make educated guesses about what should and should not be possible by analogy to what we know about the Standard Model, about General Relativity, and about proposed quantum gravity theories.

Presumably, any decay via gravity in a quantum gravity would, like decays via other forces, have to preserve all conserved quantum numbers and conserved quantities such as electromagnetic charge, color charge, mass-energy, CPT, baryon number, lepton number, and linear and angular momentum. There is also good reason to think that gravitational decays would not violate CP symmetry.

But, it is also the case that one or more of these quantities which are conserved in the Standard Model might not be conserved in a quantum gravity theory, with mass-energy conservation, for example, being doubtful as a globally conserved quantity in a quantum gravity theory.

Are there any theories where this is possible?

Yes. There are theories where this is possible. A recent pre-print addressing this possibility states:

In extended models of gravity a non-minimal coupling to matter has been assumed to lead to irreversible particle creation. In this paper we challenge this assumption. We argue that a non-minimal coupling of the matter and gravitational sectors results in a change in particle-momentum on a cosmological timescale, irrespective of particle creation or decay. We further argue that particle creation or decay associated with a non-minimal coupling to gravity could only happen as a result of significant deviations from a homogeneous Friedmann-Robertson-Walker geometry on microscopic scales, and provide a phenomenological description of the impact of particle creation or decay on the cosmological evolution of the density of the matter fields.

R.P.L. Azevedo, P.P. Avelino, "Particle creation and decay in nonminimally coupled models of gravity" (Submitted on 18 Jan 2019 (v1), last revised 29 Mar 2019 (this version, v2)) (minor punctuation and spelling corrections made editorially to abstract language quoted above without indication).

This paper concludes as follows:

In this work we challenged the assumption that the NMC between geometry and the matter fields might be responsible for particle creation/decay in the absence of significant perturbations to the FLRW metric on microscopic scales. We have argued that there is only one consistent interpretation for the modification to the evolution of the energy density of a fluid made of soliton-like particles associated to the the NMC between the gravitational and the matter fields in a FLRW universe: a change in particle-momentum on a cosmological timescale (rather than particle creation or decay). We have considered the possibility that perturbations to the FLRW geometry on microscopic scales, eventually in association to significant extensions to the NMC theory of gravity studied in the present paper, may be responsible for particle creation or decay. We have also have provided a phenomenological description of particle creation/decay by defining an “effective Lagrangian” which incorporates these effects.

  • $\begingroup$ A quantum theory of gravity is not needed to calculate tree-level rates of graviton emission; the semiclassical theory suffices. $\endgroup$ – Buzz Aug 1 '19 at 7:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Buzz The mere hypothesis that gravitons exist and are emitted in a manner analogous to other quantum mechanical carrier bosons, is, by definition, at least a partial theory of quantum gravity, even if it isn't completely worked out. As I note, there are features such as tree-level rates of graviton emission which are generic to large classes of quantum gravity theory and can provide insight without a complete quantum gravity theory, but one is still resorting to quantum gravity theory to get an answer. $\endgroup$ – ohwilleke Aug 1 '19 at 13:54

The closest gravitation decay process we understand is Hawking radiation. A black holes with area $A=8\pi M^2$ is composed of $N$ Planck masses or with $M=Nm_{pl}$. The emission of a quanta or a boson, so $N\rightarrow N-1$ is a sort of decay process, and will repeat until the black hole is evaporated.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It should be noted that we haven't observed Hawking radiation yet. It fits well into the quantum physics we do know, but so far, it's entirely theoretical and unconfirmed. Still worth a mention, but with a caveat. $\endgroup$ – Luaan Jul 31 '19 at 7:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Agreed, but it is observed in optical systems analogous to black holes. That may be the best we are able to do. $\endgroup$ – Lawrence B. Crowell Jul 31 '19 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ There is this paper arxiv.org/pdf/1906.10100.pdf by Arkani-Hamaed Huang and O'Connell that illustrates how a black hole is a sort of elementary particle. $\endgroup$ – Lawrence B. Crowell Aug 9 '19 at 10:12

It is impossible in perturbative QFT.

The quantum field theory of gravity is not renormalizeable, but you can always calculate processes in perturbation theory in the effective field theory at low energy. In this effective field theory, matter couples to gravity with interaction Lagrangian

$$\mathcal{L}_{\rm int} \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{32\pi G}} T_{\mu\nu} h^{\mu\nu}.$$

Naively, we would like to have a "beta-like" decay via the diagram:

enter image description here

But because the stress tensor $T$ only couples particles to themselves, the particle $\psi'$ is actually the same as the particle $\psi$ and this is not a decay at all. In beta decay, the case is different, as the $W$ carries weak charge, so e.g. neutrons can decay to protons.

This means that the decay is impossible in the effective theory of gravity. On the other hand, a decay through Hawking radiation, as described by Anders Sandberg above and others, is in principle possible.

  • $\begingroup$ So will this be true for any massless spin 2 particles? You are using the stress tensor which only applies to spin 2 particles to my knowledge. $\endgroup$ – Aravind Karthigeyan Aug 8 '19 at 18:47
  • $\begingroup$ @AravindKarthigeyan yes I think that's correct, unless the spin 2 carries some kind of charge, in which case it would probably not couple to the ordinary stress tensor $\endgroup$ – Eric David Kramer Aug 12 '19 at 8:46

My message corresponds to my thoughts on this issue and therefore is not described in the literature. The law of interaction between masses and charges has the form $$\vec F=\frac{(ie+m1\sqrt{G})(ie+m2\sqrt{G})}{r^3}\vec r$$ But in nature there are either large masses and a small charge, or small masses of elementary particles and the charge is large compared to the mass, so the interaction between the imaginary charge and the actual mass is not described. The contribution of the imaginary part of the force is determined by the formula $$\vec F=Re\vec F+Im\vec F sin\omega t$$ The frequency must be taken Compton. Why am I saying this, the fact is that imaginary charges form the imaginary part of the mass, and the decay of an elementary particle forms. Real charges - masses cannot have this effect.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.