# Sonority of metals [closed]

Is there any reasonable atomic theory which can provide a rational reason for the existence of sonority in metals?

Almost all the non-metals do not exhibit sonority. Can it be correlated to the material's atomic structure? Are there any metals which do not show sonority? If not, then why not?

## closed as unclear what you're asking by Jon Custer, John Rennie, stafusa, GiorgioP, Aaron StevensJul 29 at 17:54

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• 'Sonority' is not a common term in physics. If you mean resonance (closely related in meaning), then many materials resonate including such non-metals as good wine glasses. Unclear what nuclear-physics or atomic-physics has to do with this question. Please clarify. – Jon Custer Jul 24 at 13:26
• Can you give which definition of "sonority" you're using? There are many possible definitions for this term, many of which make the claim "There is almost negligible evidence of sonority in non metals" incorrect. – probably_someone Jul 24 at 13:26
• 'Sonority' is defined here as the ability of a material to produce a ringing sound when struck hard. – Shishir Maharana Jul 24 at 13:29
• The physics property that underlies your "sonority" is elasticity. Highly elastic materials store potential energy when they are deformed, and they return the energy when allowed to relax back to their natural shape. Inelastic materials tend to turn the energy of deformation into heat. Materials that make good bells (e.g., glass, some ceramics, some kinds of stone, and most metals) are all highly elastic. (If that sounds counter intuitive, it's because the every-day meaning of "elastic" is based on misunderstanding the physics meaning.) – Solomon Slow Jul 24 at 13:58
• I agree with @SolomonSlow. For a high Q-factor, damping has to be small. Glass would also be good, but it is just too fragile for percussion instruments or tuning forks. – Pieter Jul 24 at 15:24

For metals under small loads, the stress and strain are in phase. The phase angle $$\delta$$ is given by $$\tan\delta=\frac{E''}{E'}$$ where $$E''$$ is the loss modulus and $$E'$$ is the storage modulus. So for metals, the phase angle is (nearly) zero. So the loss modulus is zero and the loading and unloading curves are superposed on each other. This means that the intervening area is zero and there is no hysteresis loss. Thus low loss modulus means that there is low damping which in turn means that metals are sonorous.
• The properties of lead are different from other metals at room temperature. Lead is extremely soft at room temperature so that it can easily deform when struck and it absorbs the energy of the strike resulting in a dull knocking sound. However if dipped in liquid nitrogen and cooled to $-196^\circ$C, lead becomes stiffer and as a result the sound changes, increases both in pitch and duration. – Richard Jul 25 at 7:43