2
$\begingroup$

I'm solving the Einstein equation assuming a cylindrical symmetry and found something interesting which I never saw elsewhere. I now feel that I may have found the Melvin magnetic universe solution in another form but need a confirmation (sorry for the lengthy exposition below). Assume the following metric (a cylindrical universe): \begin{equation}\tag{1} ds^2 = dt^2 - a^2(t) g^2(r)(dx^2 + dy^2) - b^2(t) \, dz^2, \end{equation} where $a(t)$, $b(t)$ and $g(r)$ are unknown functions. Of course: $r =\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$ and we could use $dx^2 + dy^2 = dr^2 + r^2 d\varphi^2$. I want an homogeneous and isotropic spatial section in the plane $x \, y$, so the function $g(r)$ isn't completely arbitrary. Calculating the Riemann tensor give these components (here, $i, j, k = 1, 2$ only, for the coordinates $x$ and $y$): \begin{align} R^0_{i 0 j} &= a \ddot{a} \, g^2 \, \delta_{ij}, \\[12pt] R^0_{303} &= b \ddot{b}, \\[12pt] R^i_{33j} &= -\, \frac{\dot{a} \dot{b} b}{a} \, \delta_{ij}, \\[12pt] R^i_{jkl} &= (\dot{a}^2 g^2 + \mathcal{Q}(r))(\delta_{ki} \, \delta_{lj} - \delta_{li} \, \delta_{kj}) + \text{anisotropic terms}. \end{align} The anisotropic terms cancel if \begin{equation}\tag{2} \frac{g^{\prime \prime}}{g} = \frac{g^{\prime}}{g \, r} + 2 \frac{g^{\prime 2}}{g^2}, \end{equation} which implies the solution \begin{equation}\tag{3} g(r) = \frac{A}{1 + B \, r^2}, \end{equation} where $A$ and $B$ are constants (they can be absorbed into the coordinates, so I'll take $A = 1$). Then \begin{equation}\tag{4} \mathcal{Q}(r) = 4 B \, g^2. \end{equation} Note that if $B$ is positive, then the whole $x \, y$ plane has a finite area: $\mathcal{A}_{x y} = \frac{\pi}{B}$ (that plane is compact)! The components of the Einstein tensor could be calculated without troubles (again, $i, j = 1, 2$ only): \begin{align} G_{00} &= -\, \Big( 2 \frac{\dot{a} \dot{b}}{a b} + \frac{\dot{a}^2}{a^2} + \frac{4 B}{a^2} \Big), \tag{5} \\[12pt] G_{ij} &= -\, \Big( \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} + \frac{\ddot{b}}{b} + \frac{\dot{a} \dot{b}}{a b} \Big) \, g_{ij}, \tag{6} \\[12pt] G_{33} &= -\, \Big( 2 \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} + \frac{\dot{a}^2}{a^2} + \frac{4 B}{a^2} \Big) \, g_{33}. \tag{7} \end{align} I then need an anisotropic (i.e. cylindrical) perfect fluid stress-tensor, of components \begin{equation}\tag{8} T_{\mu \nu} = (\rho + \sigma) \, u_{\mu} u_{\nu} + (p - \sigma) \, n_{\mu} n_{\nu} - \sigma \, g_{\mu \nu}, \end{equation} where $p \equiv p_{\parallel}$ and $\sigma \equiv p_{\perp}$ are the pressure along the $z$ axis and in the plane $x \, y$, respectively. The fluid four-velocity is $u^{\mu} = (1, 0, 0, 0)$ (such that $u_{\mu} \, u^{\mu} = 1$) and the symmetry axis is represented by the spacelike four-vector $n^{\mu} = (0, 0, 0, 1/b(t))$ (such that $n_{\mu}\, n^{\mu} = -1$). The local conservation of fluid $\nabla_{\mu} T^{\mu \nu} = 0$ implies the following: \begin{equation}\tag{9} \dot{\rho} + \Big( 2 \frac{\dot{a}}{a} + \frac{\dot{b}}{b} \Big) \rho + \frac{\dot{b}}{b} p + 2 \frac{\dot{a}}{a} \sigma = 0. \end{equation} Take note that a purely magnetic field could be cast into (8): \begin{equation} T_{\mu \nu} = F_{\mu \lambda} F^{\lambda}_{\; \; \nu}+ \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\lambda \kappa} F^{\lambda \kappa}, \end{equation} with $F_{12}$ the only component. We then have $p = -\, \rho$ (negative pressure = tension along the magnetic field lines) and $\sigma = + \rho$, such that the trace of (8) cancels: $g^{\mu \nu} T_{\mu \nu} = \rho - p - 2 \sigma = 0$. Equ. (9) then implies the standard energy density of radiation in cosmology: \begin{equation}\tag{10} \rho(t) = \frac{\text{cste}}{a^4(t)}. \end{equation} Putting all these into Einstein equation $G_{\mu \nu} = -\, 8 \pi G \, T_{\mu \nu}$ give the following equations to be solved: \begin{align} 2 \frac{\dot{a} \dot{b}}{a b} + \frac{\dot{a}^2}{a^2} + \frac{4 B}{a^2} = 8 \pi G \rho, \tag{11} \\[12pt] \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} + \frac{\ddot{b}}{b} + \frac{\dot{a} \dot{b}}{a b} = -\, 8 \pi G \sigma = -\, 8 \pi G \rho, \tag{12} \\[12pt] 2 \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} + \frac{\dot{a}^2}{a^2} + \frac{4 B}{a^2} = -\, 8 \pi G p = +\, 8 \pi G \rho. \tag{13} \end{align} If the constant $B$ is positive, solving these give $a(t) = \text{cste}$ (so $\rho = \text{cste}$ !) and $b(t) = \sin{\omega t}$ (for $0 < \omega t < \pi$, where $\omega = \sqrt{8 \pi G \rho}$).

I'm perplexed by this solution, which appears to describe a magnetic universe, homogeneous, isotropic and static in the plane $x \, y$, and expanding/contracting along the $z$ axis.

Is this the Melvin's magnetic universe in another form? Usually, Melvin's universe is described by the following static metric: \begin{equation}\tag{14} ds^2 = \Phi^2(r) (dt^2 - dr^2 - dz^2) - \frac{1}{\Phi^2(r)} \, r^2 d\varphi^2, \end{equation} where $\Phi(r) = 1 + C \, r^2$ (this function is similar to (3) above).

So how can I verify that metric (1) is equivalent to metric (14)? \begin{equation}\tag{15} ds^2 = d\tilde{t}^2 - \frac{1}{(1 + B \, \tilde{r}^2)^2}(d\tilde{r}^2 + \tilde{r}^2 \, d\varphi^2) - \sin^2{\omega \tilde{t}} \, d\tilde{z}^2. \end{equation}

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

This is not a Melvin's magnetic universe but Bertotti–Robinson spacetime which is simply a product $\text{AdS}_2 \times S_2$ of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime and a sphere.

Equation (3) together with the $a(t)$ being constant makes this a product spacetime and the line element of $ds_{2}^2=g(r)^2 (dx^2+dy^2)$ is a metric of $S_2$ or $H_2$ (depending on the sign of $B$) in stereographic projection.

The $t$$z$ part is simply a $\text{AdS}_2$ metric. In higher dimensions this coordinate choice produces hyperbolic spatial slices.

The isometry group of such spacetime is a product $SO(2,1)\times SO(3)$ of isometries of its factors acting transitively, so all points of this spacetime are equivalent, this universe is filled with homogeneous EM field.

A paper that highlights the differences and similarities between Bertotti–Robinson's and Melvin's solutions is

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot for the arXiv paper. This is interesting! Sadly, I don't have access to the first link. What is it? $\endgroup$ – Cham Jul 16 at 18:41
  • $\begingroup$ I'm also surprised by the $\text{AdS}_2$, since there is no cosmological constant in the solution I've shown here. $\endgroup$ – Cham Jul 16 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ The first link is simply the officially published version of the arXiv preprint (they might differ by some copyediting). The $\text{AdS}_2$ is a factor, not the whole spacetime. $\endgroup$ – A.V.S. Jul 16 at 19:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.