8
$\begingroup$

Does ionization process release energy?

In the case of helium atoms, to ionize the first electron, energy is injected, which is 24.59 eV of the experimental results.

Will helium emit energy in the process? After the first electron is released, the second electron will automatically change its orbit, retreat from a high-energy orbit to the lowest-energy orbit (-54.42eV), and release energy, right? Is there such an ionization experiment that confirms or negates this conclusion?

Initial helium has 2 electrons in the same shell, it's full of electrons at first layer so it's the most stable atom. After 1st electron is ejected to infinity with 24.59eV energy, the 2nd relocates to the lowest energy level -54.42eV, about 30eV energy is emitted. Is this correct? Net energy is plus value in ionization process? What's wrong with this scenario?

I guess there is a problem with the design of experiments to measure helium ionization energy. It does not take into account that helium atoms emit high-frequency (far ultraviolet, near long-wave X-rays) photons at the first ionization. Because it was not taken into account, there would not be such a measurement result. But helium does emit energy at the first ionization.

The problem here arises from the electron orbital theory of the current mainstream physics. Mainstream theory now holds that electrons in the same orbit, such as 1S, have the same constant energy. This applies to hydrogen atom of a single electron, not to the helium atom. Helium atoms have two repulsive and interacting electrons, which can not be solved by Schrodinger equation and can not be explained by the solution of hydrogen atoms.

The two electrons of helium atom have the same energy in 1S orbit. When one is knocked out, the other's energy decreases, as evidenced by the fact that the second ionization energy is 54.4eV.

After losing one electron, the other reduces energy by releasing photons. This photon release has not been thought of and not been discovered by physical experiments. But it should exist.

So the 1S orbit is not ground state orbit, there is "underground state" orbit.

To zwol , by hydrogen-like I mean the ionized helium atom with only one electron. There is another word I can't remember.

According to the orbital theory of quantum mechanics, an orbital is a container that can hold one or two electrons. Whether one or two electrons are there, the parameters of the container remain the same. This is obviously incorrect.   Let’s say hydrogen atom. The 1S orbital radius of hydrogen atom derived from Schrodinger equation is 52.9pm, which is the same as that of Bohr model. Assuming that we manually force another electron into the 1S orbit, it will certainly affect the radius of the orbit, which can no longer be equal to 52.9pm. This is obvious because of the repulsive force between electrons. If we can get the value by Schroedinger equation, it must be bigger than 52.9.   Although helium atoms cannot be solved by Schrodinger equation, the same conclusion can be drawn by analogy. When one electron or two electrons are in orbital, the state of that orbit will be different. It is impossible to remain the same.

Back to helium atom ionization topic. In the process of knocking out the first electron (that is, when the first electron is moving from original place to infinity), the orbit of the second electron changes. Its energy level is reduced from some value to -54.4eV. These two processes are running concurrently, it's not true that after the first electron is knocked out, the orbital of the second electron begins to change. So, my original assumption that 29.8 eV would be emitted is incorrect. There is no such radiation.

The first ionization energy 24.6 is the result of the common contribution of both nucleus and another electron. If there is no other electron, or if the state of another electron is forcibly fixed, the first ionization energy will not be 24.6, but a higher number.

From this analysis, we can also see that the transition of energy level is an ordinary movement of electrons, there is time for the process. The ionization is the upward transition. Electron is knocked to infinity from original lower energy level.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I guess there is a problem with the design of experiments to measure helium ionization energy. It does not take into account that helium atoms emit high-frequency (far ultraviolet, near long-wave X-rays) photons at the first ionization. Because it was not taken into account, there would not be such a measurement result. But helium does emit energy at the first ionization. $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 17 at 10:13
  • $\begingroup$ In a word: no. If your question reduces to "I think that the professionals that have been doing this stuff for the past eighty years are all incompetent and I know better", then maybe you should rethink just how well you understand the solutions the professionals use. In this particular case, it just boils down to some pretty egregious misunderstandings which would be easily remedied by picking up a textbook on atomic physics. I recommend Bransden and Joachain's Physics of Atoms & Molecules, but there are plenty of good ones. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Jul 21 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ "have two repulsive and interacting electrons, which can not be solved by Schrodinger equation" — that's clearly false. Although you cannot solve the problem by analytical methods only, there's lots of research done, with ever increasing precision of numerical solution of this problem, especially for eigenenergies. $\endgroup$ – Ruslan Jul 22 at 17:31
11
$\begingroup$

As far as I know the effect you describe isn't seen in helium. That's because the reorganisation takes place while the photon is ejecting the electron. The experimentally observed ionisation energy of helium is the energy difference between the unionised atom and the ion after reorganisation.

However this effect is certainly seen when heavier atoms are ionised by high energy photons such as X-rays. This is the basis of X-ray fluorescence. An X-ray photon ejects a $1s$ electron from the atom and the other electrons then reorganise and emit X-rays in the process.

This effect is alse seen when atoms are ionised by electron beams an in fact it is the mechanism by which X-ray tubes work. In an X-ray tube an incoming electron ionises a tungsten atom by ejecting one of the inner electrons, then the rest of the electrons reorganise and emit an X-ray photon in the process.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks John. For no observation in helium ionization, may it be because experiments were not well designed? Or the two energies were mixed then cancelled out? $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 4:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CangYe I think the effect is only observed when an innermost electron is ejected in a heavy atom. For example commercial X-ray tubes use electrons to eject the $1s$ electron from a tungsten atom, and the X-rays are emitted when the other electrons reorganise downwards. However it isn't seen when you ionise the outermost electron in tungsten. I'm not sure why this is. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jul 16 at 4:44
  • $\begingroup$ But the energy gap is so big ( 54.4-24.59)eV , very big energy differnce. The photon should be easily observed. $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 4:59
  • $\begingroup$ @CangYe A helium atom in the ground state has two electrons, both in the 1s orbital, so when you knock one of them out with a photon, the other one isn't affected (as the most probable outcome). The effect you're looking for would only be seen if the helium atoms were already in an excited state (in which case it might be very hard to distinguish from background decay to the ground state), and in heavier elements, where at least one electron has to be in a higher orbital even in the ground state. $\endgroup$ – zwol Jul 16 at 15:15
  • $\begingroup$ @zwol that isn't true as with two electrons the interelectron repulsion increases the energy of the $1s$ orbital. If this weren't the case the first and second ionisation energies would be the same. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jul 16 at 15:18
3
$\begingroup$

Here is an outline of how students can measure the ionization lines of helium, as an example of measuring spectra, and it answers the title,whether energy is released when an electron falls from a higher level to a lower.

The experiment looks like this:

lineslfohelium

The spectrum shown means the emission of those lines, which, by definition of line emission, means that an electron fell to that line in order to give the photons measured, i.e. the atom gave up energy.

The Helium Atomic Model

The model of the excited helium atom is approximated by having one of the electrons in the 1s level, the lowest energy level. This electron is called the screening electron, as it may partially screen out the nucleus. The remaining electron, the valence electron, is in an excited state. It emits a photon when it moves to a lower energy state.

So the answer is yes, there are experiments. X-ray levels are harder to experiment with, but there are mathematical models that have fitted the data, and the physics is the same.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Answer is yes, so which line in the spectrum is emitted by 2nd electron retreation after ejecting 1st one? $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 4:47
  • $\begingroup$ I am not an expert on helium to pick the lines. I just gave you an example how lines of falling in from an excited level are seen experimentally. These could very well be lines of the outer electron being excited to a higher level and then falling into a lower . If you wan to see the line that happens when the "screening electron" is hit by external radiation which ionises the atom and the other electron falls down to its place, the process is complicated arxiv.org/pdf/1801.09977.pdf as there are many energy levels, The physics is the same as simple transitions. $\endgroup$ – anna v Jul 16 at 5:59
  • $\begingroup$ It not in the range of above spectrum. The 2nd electron relocation releases an energy around 30eV, wavelength is near X ray. The experiments didn't observe. $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 6:10
  • $\begingroup$ I told you that one would have to do a specific experiment, but gave you a link for the theory. Once one has the theoretical model it is not necessary to do all the experiments. See also these measurements inspirehep.net/record/943684/files/jpconf11_312_022004.pdf $\endgroup$ – anna v Jul 16 at 6:59
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks , Anna. Already upvoted your answer, very helpful. $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 7:03
2
$\begingroup$

The first ionization energy for helium is 24.59 eV, and the second ionization energy is 54.42 eV, but this does not mean that the second electron is left in an excited quantum state after first ionization, nor that 29.83 eV is unaccounted-for somehow.

The "hydrogen-like" model is inaccurate for $\mbox{He}^{0}$, but, as far as I can remember, it's not qualitatively inaccurate; it only gets the numerical values of the energy levels wrong. It is still reasonable to describe the gross electronic quantum states of $\mbox{He}^{0}$ with the four quantum numbers $n$, $l$, $m$, and $s$ from the hydrogen-like model ("gross" means ignoring spin-orbit coupling, fine structure, hyperfine structure, etc). In those terms, the ground state of $\mbox{He}^{0}$ has two electrons, both with quantum numbers $n=1$, $l=0$, $m=0$ (and different values of $s$). When that atom interacts with a photon and is ionized once (to $\mbox{He}^{+}$), this process (most likely) removes one electron and leaves the other still with quantum numbers $n=1$, $l=0$, $m=0$. There isn't any "underground" electronic state for the remaining electron to decay into.

It's true that the $n=1$, $l=0$, $m=0$ electronic state of $\mbox{He}^{0}$ has a different energy than the same state in $\mbox{He}^{+}$. This discrepancy demonstrates that the hydrogen-like model is quantitatively wrong for $\mbox{He}^{0}$. But the change in energy levels is inextricably coupled to the removal of the first electron. The 29.83 eV that you think needs to be emitted somehow, actually went into reducing the energy required to remove the first electron.

A classical analogy would be: suppose you have two equal weights on opposite sides of a balance scale in a lab on Earth's surface. Whichever weight you pick up first, you have to do less work to lift it to a shelf 10 cm above the pivot point of the scale, because the other weight moves downward as you lift the first one.

(I believe I am saying exactly the same thing as John Rennie's answer says, only with different words.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks zwol, it's very helpful. upvoted. Got your idea, I will write some words later. $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 18 at 23:47
1
$\begingroup$

You're thinking about this all wrong. A helium atom is an isolated quantum system; the initial state and the final state have to be treated in their entireties, not separated into bits and pieces.

The initial state of the system is (two electrons in the 1s orbital plus alpha particle plus incoming photon) and the final state of the system is (one electron in some orbital plus alpha particle with recoil plus outgoing electron plus some number photons). Next, you have to check to make sure that your final state conserves all the important stuff: energy, momentum, angular momentum. Finally, you can look at the overlaps between the wavefunctions of your initial and final states to see what you're most likely to get.

In this case, the overwhelmingly most probable outcome for an incoming photon near the one-electron ionization energy is that the remaining electron winds up in the 1s state of the helium ion and there are no additional photons. This is because adding photons straightforwardly decreases the probability by the fine structure constant.

However, if your incoming photon has enough energy, it's possible to get the remaining electron in a higher orbital from which it will fall, emitting a second photon. Here's a paper on the subject: Simultaneous Photoionization and Photoexcitation of Helium. In fact, if your incoming photon has enough energy, it's possible (but rare) to knock both electrons out with the same photon. Here's a paper about that: Double photoionization of helium

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Unlike hydrogen, for helium atom, knocking out an electron will definitely affect another electron' s state, no matter how we think it. This is two electron system, they are expelled inside atom space, right? $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 14:50
  • $\begingroup$ Both Bohr model and Schrödinger model are not working for atoms other than hydrogen. One electron system is the simplest atom, in which there is no interelectron repulsion to consider. $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ The 1st and 2nd ionization energies are telling true story. We need at least 24.59 eV photon to knock out anyone of the two electrons. After one is gone, another changes its state, needs 54.42 eV to inonize. Ejection of one electron makes the atom lowered its energy, right? The lowered part must be emitted out. $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 15:51
  • $\begingroup$ @CangYe There is no "the other changes its state". The entire system changes its state to something else. This happens simultaneously; it is a quantum leap. $\endgroup$ – Xerxes Jul 16 at 16:19
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, we had better to say the entire atom changes its energy after knocking out one electron. The knocked out electron's energy increased from -24.59ev to zero, which was given by photon of ionization energy. how about the remaining atom's energy? From what does it decrease to -54.42 eV? $\endgroup$ – Cang Ye Jul 16 at 16:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.