0
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

In defining conservative force, we say that

"The potential energy difference is path independent."

However, as far as I understand, potential energy only exists when there is a force field.

People say one example of non-conservative force.

By definition, non-conservative force should be the one in which the difference in potential energy is path dependent. But where is potential energy for friction which is not a force field?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Aaron Stevens, John Rennie newtonian-mechanics Jul 15 at 16:40

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you give a reference? Potential energy is something we can define for conservative forces, but you are right, if they are not conservative then there is no potential energy associated with them $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Jul 15 at 15:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hint: The correct definition refers to work, not potential energy. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jul 15 at 15:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of What causes a force field to be "non-conservative?" $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Jul 15 at 15:57
1
$\begingroup$

I think you mean to say a conservative force $\mathbf F$ is one where we can define a potential energy $U$ such that $$\mathbf F=-\nabla U$$

Then the work done by that force is independent of the path and only depends on the endpoints of the path. In other words, the work is given by: $$W=\int\mathbf F\cdot\text d\mathbf l=\int(-\nabla U)\cdot\text d\mathbf l=U_{\text{start}}-U_{\text{end}}$$ by the fundamental theorem of calculus.

On the other hand, we cannot express a non-conservative force in terms of a potential energy. Therefore, we cannot apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to the work integral, and therefore there is a path dependence on the work.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for edit my question (con - "with"). Thank you again. $\endgroup$ – Sebastiano Jul 19 at 8:08

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.