I've been always fascinated with how easily scifi characters travel around the Solar system and sometimes the galaxy. They just hop into a spacecar and go wherever they want.
So I've come up with a thought experiment that reproduces such a trip with modern technology. Only existing means of propulsion are allowed (i. e. no hyperdrive, lightfold, wormholes, etc), but existing technology can be imagined as idealized, perfected.
The goal is to make a roundtrip to the outskirts of the solar system. Let's imagine that we would like to reach a Voyager, chip a tiny piece off it as a souvenir and bring it back home. This is what a scifi hero could do in a single episode!
The "Swordfish II" customized MONO racer fueling up on Ganymede, Jupiter. It's imagined to be capable, all by itself, of rising off Ganymede and flying around the moons of Jupiter, as well as rising from Earth to the orbit around Earth. It only needs assistance for crossing the Solar system in like a day.
Here are the "givens":
- We want to make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. Like weeks, not years.
- Since that would cause life-threatening overload (G factor), we're gonna send an automatic probe.
- The probe weighs exactly 1 kg, which includes hull, electronics, manipulator, engine, batteries, etc — everything except fuel.
- We're assuming that the probe is travelling a straight line in open space with no gravity acting on it.
- We do not account for the weight of fuel tanks hull. Let's assume that fuel tanks are made of fuel and are consumed efficiently.
- The engine is capable of efficiently burning huge amounts of fuel in small amounts of time so that it reaches cruising speed quickly and spends most of the travel time flying with inertia.
- We do not account for the weight of the souvenir we're chipping off Voyager. Or let's say we're making a close-up film photo of it and carrying the film there and back, weight of the film accounted in the weight of the probe. The important part is to stop at Voyager and then stop back at Earth.
- At the start of the flight, the probe and its target are stationary in relation to each other.
- I'm not specifying the parameters of the engine, the specific distance, time restrictions, etc. Those numbers are arbitrary and Voyager is just a legend (that might not even work out, I hope I'm not violating the speed of light...).
- ⚠ Now the tricky part. Let's say that I have accounted of all those factors and calculated that in order to reach the initial speed necessary to meet time restrictions, the probe will need to burn 1000 kg of fuel. This is a "given".
But the problem is that the probe will have no fuel to stop. It will fly past the Voyager, being able neither to carefully pinch a fragment off Voyager, nor return back home.
In other words, the trip has four legs:
→ →
← ←
- accelerating towards Voyager,
- decelerating,
- accelerating towards home,
- decelerating.
And my calculation of 1000 kg of fuel only accounted for the first leg, which would result in the loss of the probe! In order to stop the probe and complete the second leg, it would need another 1000 kg of fuel, but there's no gas station in the middle.
Our only option is to take extra fuel with us, which will increase the weight of the payload.
So the question of my thought experiment is: given that 1000 kg of fuel are needed for a 1 kg probe to complete just the first leg of the trip in desired time, how much fuel does the probe need to take in order to complete four legs?
My understanding is that this problem can be solved with a simple proportion:
Payoad Fuel
Current leg A B
Next leg A+B ?
And the general answer is X = (A+B)*B/A
.
Here's the specific solution and answer, rounded down to the order of magnitude:
Payoad Fuel
One leg 1 kg 10^3 kg
Two legs 10^3 kg 10^6 kg
Three legs 10^6 kg 10^9 kg
Four legs 10^9 kg 10^12 kg
So my answer to the thought experiment is that more than a trillion (10^12) kg of fuel will be necessary for the described roundtrip of a 1 kg probe. That's more than the weight of 166 pyramids of Giza!
That also compares to roughly 1% of crude oil reserves on Earth. I can imagine that getting this much weight to orbit would require burning ALL of Earth's oil.
The question for this StackOverflow post: is my way of thought correct? Can the payload-to-fuel ratio of 1-to-1000 (provided as a "given" for the first leg of the trip) be extrapolated like this with a simple proportion?
My friends say that this problem cannot be solved without the knowledge of the parameters of the engine, etc. They also say that my computation requires having a multiply more engines for each subsequent leg.
But I believe that the parameters of the engine would only be necessary to learn how much time it will take for the probe to complete four legs. But that's not part of the question. Time has been accounted in the "given" for the first leg and is no longer a concern.
They also say that since the ship gets lighter as it burns fuel, this problem can not be solved with a simple proportion, and some complex formulas are needed.