2
$\begingroup$

In time-dependent perturbation theory, when assuming $\hat{V}$ is time-independent, the time development operator is as:

$$\hat{U}(t,0)\theta(t)=e^{-i(\hat{H_{0}}+\hat{V})t}=\int \frac{dw}{2\pi}\frac{i}{w-\hat{H_{0}}-\hat{V}+i\epsilon}e^{-iwt}$$

where $\theta(t)$ is equal to 1 when $t\geq1$, and 0 otherwise.

My question is the following:

  1. Clearly in above equation an extra imaginary $i\epsilon$ is added into $\hat{H_{0}}+\hat{V}$. Could anyone justify such an added term?

  2. Even we admit that added term, I still did not figure out how the second equation holds: $$e^{-i(\hat{H_{0}}+\hat{V}-i\epsilon)t}=e^{-i(\hat{H_{0}}+\hat{V}-i\epsilon)t}\int \frac{dw}{2\pi}e^{iwt}e^{-iwt} =\int\frac{dw}{2\pi}(e^{iwt}e^{-i(\hat{H_{0}}+\hat{V}-i\epsilon)t})e^{-iwt}.$$

I cannot see the terms in parentheses is equal to $\frac{i}{w-\hat{H_{0}}-\hat{V}+i\epsilon}$

  1. When I did numerical calculations, how should I choose a proper value for $\epsilon$
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The $i\epsilon$ is introduced to make sure the Fourier Transform converges. If you take directly the $e^{-i(H_0+V)t}\theta(t)$ and you fourier transform it directly you get:

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dt\theta(t)e^{-i(H_0+V)t}e^{i\omega t} = \int_{0}^{\infty} dte^{-i(H_0+V-\omega)t}=\frac{e^{-i(H_0+V-\omega)t}}{-i(H_0+V-\omega)}\bigg|_{t=0}^{t=\infty}$$

The integral is purely imaginary exponential which does not converge if $t\rightarrow \infty$ ($e^{i\infty}=??$). The only way to make sure it converges is to arbitrarily add an imaginary term in the exponential to make the integrant go to $0$ as $t\rightarrow\infty$. Since $t>0$ we need to add a $ -i\epsilon$ so that:

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dt\theta(t)e^{-i(H_0+V-i\epsilon)t}e^{i\omega t} = \int_{0}^{\infty} dte^{-i(H_0+V-\omega)t}e^{-\epsilon t}=\frac{i}{\omega-H_0 -V+i\epsilon}$$

which now converges when $t\rightarrow\infty$. The result of this Fourier transform is the result you stated.

Thus you have your result by executing the inverse transform (and taking $\epsilon\rightarrow 0$):

$$e^{-i(H_0+V)t}\theta(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}\frac{i}{\omega-H_0 -V+i\epsilon}e^{-i\omega t}$$

Conversely, if you had $\theta(-t)$ in the initial integrant, you would have to add a $+i\epsilon$ instead. Thus, time causality is dictated by the sign of this infinitesimal term.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So in numerical calculations, can I also take $\epsilon$ in the result to be zero? Besides, I see in some cases, $\epsilon$ is added to make sure the state decays into ground state. Is there any physical reason to add the imaginary $\epsilon$ apart from seeking a convergent integral? $\endgroup$ – xiang sun Jul 1 at 14:11
  • $\begingroup$ Well theoretically speaking, you need the $\pm i\epsilon$ to make the integral converge. So numerically you would put a small non-zero value. The physical reason, as stated in the answer, is to make sure time causality is preserved (because of the $\theta(\pm t)$ functions). $\endgroup$ – fgoudra Jul 1 at 14:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.