2
$\begingroup$

Consider a potential $V(x)$ in 1d. Suppose that $V(|x| > a )= 0$ for some positive $a$.

We then know that the hamiltonian $H = - \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2 } + V(x)$ has non-normalizable or scattering eigenstates. Label them by the eigenenergy $E$, so the eigenstate with eigenenergy $E$ is $\psi_E(x)$.

We expect a completeness relation

$$ \delta(x_1 - x_2 ) = \int_0^\infty d E \psi_E^*(x_1) \psi_E(x_2) + \sum_n \phi_n^*(x_1)\phi_n (x_2) , $$

where $\phi_n $ denotes the normalizable eigenstates.

The trouble here is that for the non-normalizable state $\psi_E(x)$, unlike for the normalizable states, we are free to choose their amplitude. Specifically, $f(E)\psi_E(x)$ is also an eigenstate with eigenenergy $E$, where $f(E)$ is a smooth function of $E$.

Is there a routine to choose the function $f$ so that the completeness relation holds?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am pretty sure that what you call "completeness relation" is mathematically ill-defined. $\endgroup$ – DanielC Jun 28 at 22:48
2
$\begingroup$

This issue is too technical to explain in a Stack-Exchange answer but is discussed at length in my book with Paul Goldbart.

An online draft version is at:

http://www.goldbart.gatech.edu/PostScript/MS_PG_book/bookmaster.pdf

Start looking at page 234 or so. (If you like the book it is published by CUP)

The basic strategy is to start form a finite system and allow the volume to become large so that sums become integrals. It is important to track the density of states per unit eigenvalue and the normalization of the states. This changes because the potential means that the extended states are no longer plane waves. Our book provides tricks for doing this, and also worked examples.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Please do not post links without at least a basic summary of what they contain and how that content answers the question, since link-only answers become useless if the link rots away. Link-only answers are not considered answers here and will be deleted. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jun 28 at 16:42
  • $\begingroup$ @ACuriousMind. Ok. I'll add some text. $\endgroup$ – mike stone Jun 28 at 19:53
  • $\begingroup$ @mikestone I am still looking for the relevant stuff. But it seems that your book is quite interesting. $\endgroup$ – John Jun 28 at 22:52
1
$\begingroup$

We consider the case when we have a single observable, $\xi$ forming by itself a complete commuting set, that is there is only one eigenstate of $\xi$ belonging to any eigenvalue, $\xi'$. We require this so that we can label its eigenkets with the corresponding eigenvalues when we set up a representation in terms of its eigenkets. We assume that $\xi$ has both discrete and continuous eigenvalues, $\xi^r$, $\xi^s$ and $\xi'$, $\xi''$.

We usually require the following to hold $$\langle\xi^r|\xi^s\rangle=\delta_{\xi^r\xi^s}, \quad\quad\langle\xi^r|\xi'\rangle=0, \quad\quad\langle\xi'|\xi''\rangle=\delta(\xi'-\xi'').$$

However as per convenience we can make the following relation hold $$\langle\xi'|\xi''\rangle=c(\xi')\delta(\xi'-\xi'')$$ with the previous case then being a special case when $c$ is the constant function $1$. $\frac{1}{c}$ is called the weight function of the representation, $\frac{d\xi'}{c(\xi')}$ being the 'weight' attached to a small volume element of the space of the variable $\xi$.

For example, when working in spherical polar coordinates, with $2$ of the variables being $\theta$ and $\phi$ then one takes the weight function to be $sin(\theta')$.

Note: Some of the terminology in this answer may be outdated as I learnt these things through Dirac's book and I know of some cases where this is true.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.