The Minkowski metric for $\mathbb{R}^{1,1}$ is $$ ds^2 = dt^2 - dx^2 = du dv $$ for coordinates $$ u = t + x \hspace{1cm} v = t - x $$

If you do any coordinate transformation that acts independently one $u$ and $v$,

$$ u = f(u') \hspace{1 cm} v = g(v') $$ then the metric transforms as $$ ds^2 = du dv = d(f(u')) d(f(v')) = f'(u') g'(v') du' dv'. $$

Notice that the metric in $(u', v')$ coordinates is just a local rescaling of the original metric $dudv$. Therefore this is a conformal transformation. In fact, all conformal transformations of $\mathbb{R}^{1,1}$ are of this form.

Why then do I often see written $\rm{Conf}(\mathbb{R}^{1,1}) = \rm{Diff}(S^1) \times \rm{Diff}(S^1)$? Shouldn't it just be $\rm{Conf}(\mathbb{R}^{1,1}) = \rm{Diff}(\mathbb{R}) \times \rm{Diff}(\mathbb{R})$? Why is $\mathbb{R}$ "compactified" into $S^1$?

  • $\begingroup$ Often see where? Which page? $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 17 '19 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ One example: "A Mathematical Introduction to Conformal Field Theory" by Schottenloher $\endgroup$ – user1379857 Jun 17 '19 at 23:08
  • $\begingroup$ Another example is this wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_geometry except there's also a semidirect product with $\mathbb{Z}$. $\endgroup$ – user1379857 Jun 17 '19 at 23:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ On the wiki page it explicitly says that it's working with the compactified space. $\endgroup$ – Aaron Jun 17 '19 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ But what's the point of working in compactified space for $\mathbb{R}^{1,1}$? It doesn't seem to me like anything is gained, but I feel like there must be some point. $\endgroup$ – user1379857 Jun 17 '19 at 23:45

TL;DR: The compactified definition follows a long & useful tradition in e.g. projective & conformal geometry, where one wants to treat infinity on the same footing as a point.

The upshot is that the local conformal groupoid $${\rm LocConf}(1,1)\tag{A}$$ for the 1+1D Minkowski plane is defined in mathematics as the set of locally defined conformal transformations on its conformal compactification$^1$ $$ \overline{\mathbb{R}^{1,1}}~\cong~\mathbb{S}^1\times \mathbb{S}^1 .\tag{B}$$ ${\rm LocConf}(1,1)$ contains 4 connected components. The connected component that contains the identity element is $$ {\rm LocConf}_0(1,1)~\cong~ {\rm LocDiff}^+(\mathbb{S}^1)\times {\rm LocDiff}^+(\mathbb{S}^1).\tag{C}$$ For more details, see e.g. Ref. 1 and this & this Phys.SE posts.


  1. M. Schottenloher, Math Intro to CFT, Lecture Notes in Physics 759, 2008; p. 37.


$^1$ It should be mentioned that the conformal compactification contains closed timelike loops, cf. above comment by Cinaed Simson.

  • $\begingroup$ In dimensions other than 1+1 D I can see the point for compactification because it allows you to include inversions. However, in 1+1 D I see no benefit to this compactification. The reason it disturbs me is because the Witt Algebra for example can be thought of as vector fields on $S^1$, which are different from vector fields on $\mathbb{R}$. Wouldn't the compactification change important facts about the algebra of diffeomorphisms? Again, I can see the usefulness in higher dimensions, but not in 1+1. $\endgroup$ – user1379857 Jun 19 '19 at 22:32
  • $\begingroup$ There are also inversions in 1+1D. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 20 '19 at 12:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.