1
$\begingroup$

I am doing (programming) a simple kinematic 2D simulation on blocks. The idea is that the block will have a force applied.

1) From the force and mass I calculate the the acceleration vector (will show just the x dimension, the y dimension is the same):

//F = m * a, a = F / m
block.acceleration.x = block.force.x / block.mass;

2) From the simulation elapsed time dt and acceleration I update the velocity vector:

block.velocity.x = block.velocity.x + block.acceleration.x * dt;

3) From the velocity and time dt I update the position:

block.position.x = block.position.x + block.velocity.x * dt;

Assuming this is correct (but please correct me if I am mistaken) my problem is when I try to simulate the kinetic friction force of magnitude Fk = uk * m * g (where uk is the friction coefficient and the normal is equal to the weight (m * g).

Since kinetic friction is referred as a force, my idea was take this force (actually just its magnitude) and go through the same process as above: force -> acceleration -> velocity. Then remove this velocity magnitude from the block.velocity taking care never to "invert" the block.velocity vector.

//calculate the force (kinetic friction magnitude)
kinetic_friction_force = kinetic_friction_coefficient * block_mass * g;
kinetic_friction_acceleration = kinetic_friction_force / block.mass; //a = F / m

And I stop here because I believe this does not make sense. In this last step I am cancelling out block.mass and that does not look correct.

Any thoughts?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The "F" in "F=ma" should always be the net-force.

So, assuming one-dimensional motion with a push force and a kinetic friction force, then (assuming velocity.x > 0 ),

block.velocity.x = block.velocity.x + ( (block.push.x - uk*m*g )/m ) * dt;

More generally, instead of “just the minus-sign”, it would be better to use "minus the sign of velocity.x ". Even better is to use dot-products to handle general motion on the plane.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think that your formula is the same as mine. The part: (block.push.x - uk*m*g)/m is equivalent to block.push.x/m - (uk*m*g)/m so in the friction part the mass gets cancelled out and thus my doubt. $\endgroup$ – matias.g.rodriguez Jun 14 at 1:53
  • $\begingroup$ In this special case (and possibly other special cases), yes, the equations may agree. However, the physics of Newton's second law is that a=F_net/m. There is only one acceleration vector determined by the net-force... and only one velocity-vector determined by the acceleration. It is a physics misconception that each force in a free body diagram leads to its own acceleration. $\endgroup$ – robphy Jun 14 at 2:04
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe the kinetic friction force is something else. If I do the simulation using this formula the friction won't be affected by the mass, which doesn't make sense. It looks that I should use the uk*m*g part directly on the velocity: Kinetic friction always acts against the (relative) velocity with a magnitude of fk=uk*n. $\endgroup$ – matias.g.rodriguez Jun 14 at 2:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.