2
$\begingroup$

Here is my problem: In MATLAB, I am placing a ball inside of a potential energy well, I have control over what this potential energy well looks like (a parabola for example). I then drive the ball with a force function of my choice (sin(t) for example). I then look at the resulting motion of the ball over time. This is something that I can take the Fourier Transform of to determine the frequency content of the ball's motion within the well. This red dot is my ball, keep in mind the ball's motion is 1 dimensional, the y axis just represents potential energy

When I place the ball in the bottom of a parabolic potential well and drive it with sin(t), the FT reveals two peaks: one at the frequency I'm driving it, and one frequency that corresponds to the steepness of my parabola (the resonant frequency of my parabola).FT showing the two peaks Even when I drive the ball with a sum of sine functions with different frequencies, I get n+1 peaks in my FT (if n is the number of distinct frequency sine functions I'm driving with). There is no harmonics and no sum frequency or difference frequency generation.

When I place the ball in the bottom of an asymmetric potential well (x^2/(x+1)) My asymmetric well and I drive the ball with sin(t) I get all the harmonics of sin(t), all the harmonics of the resonant frequency of the potential, and all the sum and difference frequencies that can be made. Shows the Fourier Transform with all the harmonics and sum/difference frequencies with labeling. "1st" and "2nd" indicate 1st and 2nd harmonics

My question is: Why does jiggling a ball in an asymmetric well lead to the generation of sum and difference frequencies? I'm aware they fall out of the formula sin(a)sin(b)=1/2(cos(a-b)-cos(a+b)), but it's still unclear to me why an asymmetric potential would cause two sine waves to be 'multiplied'. I'm not looking for an explanation where the frequencies fall out of some formula, I'm really looking for a fundamental/'intuitive' explanation.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Unless you are very careful about the initial conditions, the system response will be the sum of two components: the "forced response" at the excitation frequency, and the "free vibration" response if you give the ball an initial nonzer position and/or velocity, but there is no external forcing.

Since there is no damping in your system, both responses continue indefinitely.

In the first case, you have a linear system, each component of the response is a sinusoidal vibration, and the two components do not interact with each other. Therefore your Fourier decomposition has two peaks, at the forcing frequency and the free vibration frequency.

If the external force is the sum of $n$ sinusoidal terms, the response will be the superposition of the "forced" response to each one individually, plus the "free" response of the system, giving $n+1$ peaks in the Fourier decomposition.

In the second case, the system is nonlinear, and the two components of the response are both periodic but not sinusoidal. Therefore you see harmonics of their two fundamental frequencies in the Fourier decomposition. Because the system is nonlinear you also get interaction between the two components which gives you all the sum and difference frequencies.

You might want to find some literature about the Duffing equation, which models a simple nonlinear oscillator and has a parameter that specifies the amount of nonlinearity.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Alternatively, if modifying the system by adding damping is considered undesirable, one can instead add a long, slow linear ramp up in the amplitude of the driver, and then do the Fourier analysis once the stable amplitude has been reached. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 13, 2019 at 22:59
  • $\begingroup$ a most useful response. reading it reminded me of why I spend so much time here. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 13, 2019 at 23:05
  • $\begingroup$ "In the second case, the system is nonlinear, and the two components of the response are both periodic but not sinusoidal". I agree that the free vibration response is periodic but nonsinusoidal, but my forced response is sin(t) which is both periodic and sinusoidal, so I shouldn't be seeing the harmonics of the forced response, right? Also, why does the nonlinearity of the system lead to interaction between the two components? That is really my fundamental question. Although I will do some searching about Duffing Equation. $\endgroup$
    – dljs
    Commented Jun 14, 2019 at 12:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.