From Polchinski's Vol. 1 Appendix A, we can reduce the Euclidean path integral for the 1D harmonic oscillator to computing $(\det\frac{\Delta}{2\pi})^{-1/2}$ where $$\Delta = -\partial_u^2 + \omega^2.$$

Since $f_j(u) = \sqrt{2/U} \sin(j\pi u/U)$ is an eigenbasis, we compute

$$\det \frac{\Delta}{2\pi} = \prod_{j=1}^{\infty} \frac{j^2\pi^2 + \omega^2 U^2}{2\pi U^2}.$$

Here Polchinski regularizes using Pauli-Villars; he divides by the amplitude for an oscillator with very high frequency $\Omega$ and gets

$$\det \frac{\Delta}{2\pi} \to \prod_{j=1} \frac{j^2 \pi^2 + \omega^2 U^2}{j^2 \pi^2 + \Omega^2 U^2} = \frac{\Omega \sinh \omega U}{\omega \sinh \Omega U}.$$

Now he takes the $\Omega \to \infty$ limit. Why is that the appropriate limit to take at the end?

He obtains $(\det \frac{\Delta}{2\pi})^{-1/2}\approx \left(\frac{\omega}{\sinh\omega U}\right)^{1/2} e^{\frac12(\Omega U - \ln \Omega)}$ and subtracts divergences and gets the right answer. But why is $\Omega \to \infty$ the right limit to take? When we regularize, we typically take a limit at the end to "undo" it. For instance, in QFT we take $d= 4-\epsilon$ and then take $\epsilon \to 0$ at the end.


1 Answer 1


You’re only interested in the dependence of the determinant on $U$ here (the numeric value for a given $U$ depends on the normalization constant in the functional measure and is therefore unphysical).

The expression for the determinant that you’ve given exhibits $U$-independence for $\omega \rightarrow \infty$ (the $j$-dependent term becomes small compared to the other summand in the numerator, and $U^2$ cancel the $U^2$ in the denominator). Hence, in the limit of infinite frequency you’re dividing by a $U$-independent constant — an operation which is equivalent to redefining the normalization constant. That is no longer true for finite frequencies. Intuitively, setting the frequency to infinity undoes the regularization like you expected.

  • $\begingroup$ I think I got it. We don't care about the overall normalization, so we feel free to divide by some (infinite) constant. The regularization divides by a $U$-dependent function, and taking $\Omega \to \infty$ makes this function a harmless (infinite) constant which won't change the physics. Then, ultimately, Polchinski subtracts the counterterm and matches onto the $U\to \infty$ limit of the problem, which is easily solved, to determine the correct overall normalization. Jeeze, isn't there an easier way to do this?? $\endgroup$
    – Dwagg
    Sep 6, 2019 at 23:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Dwagg there are ways to quantize the harmonic oscillator that are conceptually easier. You asked a specific question about Polchinski’s book, I’ve tried to answer that exact question. $\endgroup$ Sep 7, 2019 at 15:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.