I am trying to make sense of the thermal radiation emitted by a gas.

The radiative transfer equation is $$\frac{dI}{dx} = \epsilon - \kappa I,$$ where I is the intensity, $\epsilon$ is the emissivity coefficient and $\kappa$ is the absorption coefficient. If there is no incident radiation on the gas, the solution is $$I = \frac{\epsilon}{\kappa}(1 - e^{-\kappa x}).$$

For the intensity to agree with Planck's law, we must have $$\frac{\epsilon}{\kappa} = \frac{2hf^3}{c^2}\frac{1}{e^{hf/kT} -1}.$$

Now let's imagine that the gas has only two energy levels. We could rewrite the last equation like this:

$$\frac{\epsilon}{\kappa} = \frac{2hf^3}{c^2}\frac{Ne^{-hf/kT}}{N(1-e^{-hf/kT})} = \frac{2hf^3}{c^2}\frac{N_{2}}{N_{1}},$$ where $N_{1}$ and $N_{2}$ are the number of atoms in energy levels 1 and 2 (Boltzmann).

Therefore, the ratio of emissivity and absorption coefficients is proportional to the ratio of number of atoms in levels 2 and 1, which makes sense since an atom has to be in level 2 to emit and level 1 to absorb.

But what about the fraction $\frac{2hf^3}{c^2}$? Why would emission be more probable (with respect to absorption) for higher values of $f$, i.e. for energy levels that are farther apart (assuming they are equally populated)?

  • $\begingroup$ See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…. $\endgroup$ – eranreches Jun 5 at 5:02
  • $\begingroup$ Your solution has zero intensity at $x=0$ and finite intensity in infinite space $x>0$. This function describes quite an unphysical situation. What is the original problem? $\endgroup$ – Ján Lalinský Jun 5 at 16:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.