In a lot of questions I read that a good approximation of the radiation emitted from a hot piece of steel is the black body radiation.

Than I search for the value of the emissivity of molted metal and I find that they are (for a molten Pure Iron) around 0.4 or less.

I know that the emissivity is the ratio between: the radiant exitance of that surface and the radiant exitance of a black body at the same temperature as that surface, so I expect to find a value which is very close to 1 while I get values of about 0.4.

So my question is: Why?

I hope to not forget something important.

  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand the question. The value that you find and the one that is in the document are both 0.4? What's the problem with that? $\endgroup$ Jun 4, 2019 at 19:50

1 Answer 1


I think you are confusing the fact that molten metal emits radiation with a spectrum that is very much like a black body spectrum with the fact that the material has a certain ability to absorb or emit radiation at all at any given wavelength (the emissivity).

When a physicist says something radiates like a black body, they do not mean that it has an emissivity of 1. What they mean is that spectrum of radiation is similar to that of the black body spectrum.

  • $\begingroup$ Are the spectrum of black body and the one of molten metal equal but different from a scale factor? $\endgroup$
    – Ugo Mela
    Jun 4, 2019 at 20:10
  • $\begingroup$ More or less. A black body is a theoretical construct, so when we say they are well approximated by a black body we don't necessarily mean that there is only a scale factor difference. In this case, when I have done radiation transfer calculations, I always used emissivity x sigma x T^4 as in the Stefan-Boltzmann law and did fine. $\endgroup$ Jun 4, 2019 at 20:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.