1
$\begingroup$

In the case of spherical symmetry you can say that the velocity of light (in coordinate time) goes as:

$v_{light}=c(1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2})$

in the radial direction and as:

$v_{light}=c\sqrt{(1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2})}$

in the pure non-radial direction.

Some instead tend to say that the velocity of light is always the same but "space-time is curved" in a certain way.

Are these equivalent ways of saying the same thing?

Question: Are the statement that "there is spatial variation in the velocity of light in a spherically symmetric gravitational field" and the statement that "the velocity of light is constant but spacetime in a spherically symmetric gravitational field is curved" equivalent statements?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

“Spacetime is curved” (and specifying how it is curved by writing the metric) is a much stronger statement than “there is spatial variation in the velocity of light” (with an appropriate quantification of that statement). The reason for this is that the statement about curved spacetime allows us to make predictions about how any physical process would proceed in this geometry by applying the equivalence principle, whereas the alternative statement only describes light propagation.

For example “curved spacetime” allows us to make a prediction that clocks would “slow down” near a massive body, regardless of the precise physical nature of time measurement performed by clock. We also can make prediction that neutrinos and other ultrarelativistic particles would move along nearly the same trajectories in this spacetime as light rays.

On the other hand, specifying “spatial variation in the velocity of light” would allow a physical realization of this law not only in the form of a curved spacetime but also via other analogue models of gravity (such as metamaterials). In a latter case, light propagation would formally be the same as in an equivalent gravitational field, but other physical processes would be different.

Another technical point to consider: providing the kinematics of light propagation would allow us to reconstruct only conformal structure of the spacetime and not its metric. So knowing coordinate velocities of light would not allow us to distinguish between the two metrics differing by a conformal factor.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I guess you are right. At least we would need to have "there is spatial variation in the speed of light" plus "gravitational time dilation / redshift" which you maybe get in a natural way if you assume that "space-time is curved". $\endgroup$ – Agerhell May 31 at 21:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.