0
$\begingroup$

I was asked this question during a viva examination. I tried to give answer through mathematical derivation but I was told to give the answer from intuition.

So why is $n_0 p_0 = n_i^2$, and not $n_0 + p_0 = \text{(some constant)}$

Why is $n_0 + p_0$ not constant ?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Because it is, in essence, a chemical reaction governed by detailed balance. Just like chemical equilibrium if a reaction is a product, not sum, based reaction constant. $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer May 29 at 11:47
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe it's not the physics answer, but suppose you had $n > 2n_i$. Would you expect to have $p<0$? $\endgroup$ – The Photon May 29 at 17:36
0
$\begingroup$

Consider the reaction

$${A <=> B + C}$$

Taking $A$ as the standard state, using the law of mass action or detailed balance from chemistry, the reaction constant is then

$${K = [B][C]}$$

Now, $A$ is a filled state in the valence band. $B$ is an electron in the conduction band and $C$ is a hole in the valence band. As long as there is a path for e-h generation and recombination, the reaction can and will come to equilibrium, and that equilibrium state will obey $np = $ some constant. Adding excess $B$ or $C$ through doping shifts the ratio of $B$ to $C$, but not the overall equilibrium constant.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What’s does the square bracket notation mean? $\endgroup$ – boyfarrell May 29 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ In chemistry those mean concentrations, so map directly to $n$ or $p$. $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer May 29 at 20:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.