0
$\begingroup$

For the spin-1/2 fermion field $\psi$, we may choose it to be a spinor which needs to be

  • Grassmann variable

but can also be

  • complex $\mathbb{C}$ Grassmann. (Dirac or Weyl spinor/fermion)
  • We can ask: Can be in real $\mathbb{R}$ Grassmann. (Majorana or Majorana-Weyl spinor/fermion)

What are the legal values of spin-1 field can take? real $\mathbb{R}$, complex $\mathbb{C}$, quaternion $\mathbb{H}$, .. (Grassmann)? (p.s. I remember S Adler tries to construct quaternion QFT -- is this related to the quaternion field.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In how many spacetime dimensions and in what signature? Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/53318/2451 $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic May 28 at 6:33
  • $\begingroup$ when I say complex and real - I mean complex Grassmann or real Grassmann -- I say this in separate order -- let me fix it $\endgroup$ – annie heart May 29 at 18:18
1
$\begingroup$

Fermion field can NOT be complex $\mathbb{C}$ or real $\mathbb{R}$. That is a common mistake in some text books. Fermion field must be real/complex/quaternion Grassmann variable.

Case in Point: the Majorana mass term would not be possible, if not for the Grassmann nature of the Fermion field.

In addition to real $\mathbb{R}$/complex $\mathbb{C}$/quaternion $\mathbb{H}$ Grassmann variable, you may go further up the division algebra ladder and toy with the idea of non-associative octonions $\mathbb{O}$ here

If that wets you appetite, you might want to check out sedenions $\mathbb{S}$ here.

Mind that one should be talking about octonion/sedenion Grassmann variables, the authors of the above linked papers failed to do so.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.