1
$\begingroup$

Premise: In special relativity, we come across concepts like Length Contraction and Time Dilation. Pertaining to these topics, I have come across the following diagram (or its slight variations) in many books:

enter image description here

My Question: Is the manner in which we assign coordinates (x,y,z,t) to an event, measure length contraction and time dilation limited to experiments like these (involving setup as shown in the diagram)? How intricately is our theory tied to the nature of experiment we carry out?

Does any expression (say, in the set of equations characterizing Lorentz Transformation) change when we change the nature of the experiment?

Clarification: I do not know if it is even possible to devise a truly different experiment for measuring the same quantities. If it is absurd to even talk of doing that, kindly let me know why it is so.

Any help would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Usually when people study relativity in school, they learn special relativity in a formalism that gives a preference to a certain type of coordinate system, the Minkowski coordinates $(t,x,y,z)$. Then they learn general relativity, in which all coordinate systems are allowed. Really this is just a historical artifact or an effort to avoid introducing too much new math. Special relativity can be done in any coordinate system. For example, if $x$ is a Minkowski coordinate, I can choose some new coordinate $u=x/a+(1/3)\sin (x/a)$, where $a$ is a constant, and then the coordinate system $(t,u,y,z)$ is just fine.

What is special about Minkowski coordinates is that they're orthonormal, meaning that when you form unit vectors by doing unit coordinate displacements, those unit vectors have magnitude $\pm 1$ and are orthogonal to each other, e.g., $\hat{\textbf{t}}\cdot\hat{\textbf{t}}=1$ and $\hat{\textbf{t}}\cdot\hat{\textbf{x}}=0$. We generalize the dot product from 3 space dimensions to 3+1 dimensions of spacetime in order to be able to talk about these things. The underlying mathematical machinery that allows us to define these dot products is called the metric.

So the way relativists think about relativity is not to focus on coordinates but rather on the metric.

Operationally, measurements with clocks and rulers can ultimately be related to the metric. Some very minimal measurement apparatus suffices in order to determine the metric. One example of a set of apparatus that suffices is a clock plus rays of light. You can use other apparatus, but relativity says that it's still measuring the same metric, so you'll get consistent results.

In fact, this is one of the defining characteristics of relativity compared to other theories of spacetime: it's a "metric theory." Some other theories, such as Brans-Dicke gravity, endow spacetime with additional built-in apparatus.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Relativity says that it's still measuring the same metric." That did the job :) $\endgroup$ – AkaiShuichi May 25 at 17:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.