Now, please don't dismiss this question because of its entertaining context. Today I attended a lecture by Kip Thorne and at some point he mentioned, almost offhand, that a few years ago it was found that black holes should contain three singularities.

He even said that the hero in Interstellar is saved and returns back because he comes across the "up-flying singularity". Okay, Hollywood had to find a solution, but he sounded as if this is actually a thing.

A standard search comes up with nothing that looks relevant. Do you know anything about this?

  • $\begingroup$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    May 26, 2019 at 21:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Helen: I consider it to be absolutely wrong, and not considered legit by mainstream standards, but that Thorne is trying to sell it as correct legit mainstream physics. $\endgroup$ May 29, 2019 at 7:34

2 Answers 2


Upflying singularity is certainly a nonstandard terminology but the concept this phrase is referring to is an established (and mainstream) science. This interview of Kip Thorne offers some explanation about what type of black hole singularities he was talking about. Also, Kip Thorne wrote a popular science book “The Science of Interstellar” that has chapter 26, “Singularities and Quantum Gravity” largely dedicated to this question.

A more technical (but very accessible to those only learning relativity) discussion could be found in his (with M. Scheel) paper:

  • Scheel, M. A., & Thorne, K. S. (2014). Geometrodynamics: the nonlinear dynamics of curved spacetime. Physics-Uspekhi, 57(4), 342, arXiv:1706.09078.

Section III is most relevant, and bibliography contains links to further materials, including original papers.

Some context: We are looking at the interior of a large, rotating black hole as experienced by an observer entering the black hole at late time (i.e. long after it was formed). While the region outside of the event horizon for such a black hole would rapidly approach the Kerr metric soon after its formation, the inside region differs markedly from the analytic solution (starting from the near the inner horizon). In particular, the singularities that one expects to find inside a realistic black hole are not the same as singularities of analytic metric.

Singularities in a classical general relativity are described by diverging curvature invariants, which means that tidal forces experienced by an extended bodies become infinite. Event horizon, that serves as the outer boundary of the black hole proper is not a singularity of the curvature. Quantum gravity may modify the singularity itself possibly so that there would be no singularity in the strictest sense (and investigation of such effects is a plot point of the movie) but outside such strong curvature regions the geometry of spacetime would still be described by classical general relativity.

Singularities we are looking for are generic, i.e. their qualitative features would persist over wide range of initial matter distribution leading to the formation and subsequent evolution of a black hole. So, while other types of singularities may exist inside a black hole beyond those three types they would require a special fine-tuning of initial data (such as perfect spherical symmetry) so they are unlikely to appear in a realistic black hole.


  1. Belinskii-Khalatnikov-Lifshitz (BKL) singularity (see this Wikipedia page). This is the “violent, lethal” singularity of the chaotic oscillations. It would be impossible for the observer to survive such singularity, an object entering it would experience a series of deformations (tidal stretching along some directions and compression along the others) with the orientations of these deformation changing with ever increasing frequency and the amplitude of tidal force increasing to infinity. This behavior could be illustrated by a plot:

Image from Thorne's book via Scheel & Thorne's paper

Historically, it was the first type of the generic singularity to be discovered (by a group of soviet physicists).

The other two type of singularities are located near the location of the inner horizon in the Kerr metric. This inner horizon has an ingoing and outgoing components that become the locus of two types of singularity:

  1. The ingoing component (which is a Cauchy horizon in the Kerr metric) is the locus of mass inflation singularity (referred to as an in-falling singularity in the interview). Observer approaching it (for an observer falling into the black hole this would require a very sharp relativistic maneuvering) could potentially encounter matter and radiation that would fall into a black hole over the entire time it existed (billions and trillions of years) and the gravitation of all this stuff would lead to the formation of a null singularity there. This singularity was discovered by E. Poisson and W. Israel in 1990 (original paper).

  2. The outgoing component of the inner horizon becomes the location of a shock wave singularity (this is the up-flying singularity of the interview). If outer (event) horizon of a black hole is a surface of infinite redshift for the external observer, the inner horizon is a surface of infinite blueshift, where even smallest perturbation (possibly left from the time of black hole formation) gets blueshifted to become a shock wavefront propagating along the outgoing inner horizon and producing a curvature singularity. This singularity is a more recent discovery made by D. Marolf and A. Ori in 2011 (paper).

These last two types of singularity could be considered mild in the sense that while tidal forces for any observer encountering them diverge, the total deformation (stretching and squeezing) remains finite (so in principle an object could survive passing through it only to encounter a more violent singularity of the BKL type later).

The overall structure of black hole spacetime could be illustrated by Penrose diagram:

Penrose diagram with 3 types of singularity from Thorne's paper

  • $\begingroup$ Allow me to try and distill your answer (after reading also Scheel&Thorne and some Wikipedia) to see if I get it right: Cauchy horizons are formed due to boundary conditions and non-analytical expressions. All matter and radiation that was not part of the initial collapse will pile up on one of the two resulting solutions, and will in its turn form infinite curvature. Backscattering off the inner, ring, horizon will be blushifted, which essentially forms a shockwave and piles up on the second solution, also with infinite curvature. Do these sound right? $\endgroup$
    – Helen
    May 28, 2019 at 18:01
  • $\begingroup$ There also seem to be some interesting details involved, like the ingoing singularity possessing a surface where the whole history of infalling stuff after the BH's formation is seen, and the two internal singularities forming time-like "realms" inside the BH. However I must say that my current understanding is that all this is legit mainstream work, but not necessarily accepted as correct yet. Any comments on this, perhaps? $\endgroup$
    – Helen
    May 28, 2019 at 18:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Helen: I would recommend starting your study of the Cauchy horizons with the interior structure of Reissner–Nordström geometry (a charged black hole), which also has inner horizons and mass inflation instability of Cauchy horizons yet retains spherical symmetry (and thus is much simpler). $\endgroup$
    – A.V.S.
    May 30, 2019 at 15:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JohnDuffield I'd say that this part is obvious (and continuing the other discussion, I also didn't like Interstellar), but the two new singularities were not introduced for the script's needs. (Contrary to, partially, wormholes and Contact [the novel] at least according to the urban legends; this is one of the urban legends that I like.) $\endgroup$
    – Helen
    May 30, 2019 at 20:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Helen : the moot point is that a black hole is a place where gravitational time dilation goes infinite. That means nothing ever happens. This is swept under the carpet by the people who "discover" up-flying singularities, wormholes, time travel, and the parallel antiverse. And then tell you that Oh, yes, it's all mainstream my dear.. $\endgroup$ May 31, 2019 at 7:38

He must be referring to the proposed extra dimensions to the usual (3 space +1 time) universe of General Relativity:

Another subject high on Thorne's list of topics he'd like to discuss in an update of his book is an idea used in the movie "Interstellar": that the universe human beings see is embedded in a larger universe of a higher dimension. The visible universe (called the "brane," short for membrane) has three spatial dimensions and one time dimension; a fourth spatial dimension called the "bulk" may be all around people, but they can't perceive it. In the movie "Interstellar," the "bulk" is called "the fifth dimension."

These are models people are researching . Here is Kip Thorne quoted on the three types of singularities:

Science What goes on inside a black hole

DW: What happens inside a black hole?

Kip Thorne: What we [physicists] know is this: There are three singularities inside a black hole. We didn't know that until recent years.

One of them is very violent, very lethal. It's a singularity in which there's a chaotic oscillation of the stretching and squeezing of space, what we call tidal force (like the forces by which the moon raises the tide on the earth's oceans). And this chaotic stretching and squeezing will take your body as you approach that singularity. And it will stretch your body in one direction, while squeezing it in two other directions briefly. And then it will stretch in one of those other [directions] and squeeze in two directions - briefly.

More recently, it's been discovered that there are two other singularities.

One of them, that I like to call an in-falling singularity, is understandable in this way: If you fall into a black hole in order to experience the singularities, everything that falls in after you over the entire life of the universe is seen by you. It's coming down at you behind you very rapidly ... And because of the compression of time inside a black hole, what falls in after you and over billions of years comes down on you in a fraction of a second - and in a sheet of energy that you don't want to encounter.

Then there is the up-flying singularity. That was discovered just a couple of years ago. And this is caused by all the stuff that fell into the black hole before you did. Some of it, just a tiny fraction, is scattered back at you. And that is probably the most gentle of the singularities. So if you are going to encounter a singularity, that's what you should encounter. And that is the singularity that the character Cooper encounters in the movie "Interstellar."

So it is about "encountering" i.e. observing a singularity, that to an in-falling observer there are three types of interaction with singularities, the interaction characterizing uniquely the singularity.

  • $\begingroup$ "everything that falls in after you over the entire life of the universe is seen by you" - What type of singularity is he talking about? At least for the Schwarzschild singularity this is incorrect. $\endgroup$
    – safesphere
    May 24, 2019 at 8:11
  • $\begingroup$ @safesphere it is in higher dimensions, there is a "bulk" and a "brane", so it is quantum mechanics and extensions of strings They are working on it :) example arxiv.org/pdf/1904.00216.pdf $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    May 24, 2019 at 8:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.